coding-conventions

A set of practical rules for naming, comments, constants, tests, infrastructure code, and Git commands, based on repeated review findings and production incidents.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it during implementation, code review, refactoring, and convention checks to avoid unclear names, unnecessary comments, unsafe staging commands, and other recurring mistakes.
Why use it?
It gives developers consistent guidance when writing, changing, or reviewing code, including when to follow patterns already used by the module.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Part of the dev-workflow plugin — 2 skills shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jeonje/claude-plugins/coding-conventions
Any agent
npx skills add JeonJe/claude-plugins --skill coding-conventions
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JeonJe/claude-plugins

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install dev-workflow, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 2 skills.

Per session 88 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 868 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00088 $0.00868
Opus 5 $0.00044 $0.00434
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00174
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00087

Measured 2d ago against content hash 918b158d551a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

coding-conventions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/dev-workflow/skills/coding-conventions/SKILL.md · 49 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 49 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Coding Conventions

Rules distilled from recurring review findings and production incidents. Each rule carries a one-line WHY; heavier rules keep their mechanics and precedents in references/.

How to apply

  1. Before writing code, read the target module's existing patterns first — new code mirrors the module's standard pattern (rule §4).
  2. While writing or reviewing, check the core rules below.
  3. When a rule's short form isn't enough to judge, read its detail file in references/ before making a verdict.

Core rules (short form)

§ Rule Detail
1 No external metadata (ticket IDs, spec section numbers, volatile magic values) in code comments/names references/conventions-core.md
2 No meta-words (Value, Helper, Util, Manager) in names — use domain nouns/intent verbs same
3 No comments restating obvious code — comments are for non-obvious WHY only same
4 New code mirrors the module's existing pattern same
5 Explicit git add — never -A/. same
7 Paired algorithmic constants: changing one requires re-verifying the other same
13 Reuse existing infra/harness; existence is not effectiveness — prove it fires references/s13-existing-infra-reuse.md
14 Re-verify inherited claims against HEAD before propagating references/s14-inherited-claims.md
16 finally/catch side work must never mask the main flow's result references/s16-finally-masking.md
17 Infra clients: boot-time synchronous connect and conditional bean consumption are deliberate contracts references/s17-infra-client-boot.md
19 Strong negative verdicts ("impossible / converges to zero") need one runtime observation first references/s19-runtime-observation.md
22 rg -r is --replace, not recursive — verify exact literals with grep -n or Read references/conventions-core.md
23 New dependencies pass a review gate (stdlib first, maintenance, duplicate-role check) references/conventions-core.md

Read the full file on GitHub · 49 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 49 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 918b158d551a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

coding-conventions is a skill published in the GitHub repository JeonJe/claude-plugins (3 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 868 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

api-testing

HTTP API testing with Supertest (TS) and httpx/pytest (Python). Use when the user mentions API testing, Supertest, httpx, REST/GraphQL validation, or HTTP response errors.

laurigates/claude-plugins · 45 tokens

phpunit-test-team-reviewing

Use this skill when the user asks for a team-based, consensus, multi-reviewer, or red-team review of Shopware PHPUnit tests — trigger phrases like "team review these tests", "consensus review the tests in PR.

shopwareLabs/ai-coding-tools · 52 tokens

researching-code

Use this skill when the user asks an architectural or semantic question about a codebase — phrases like "how does X work?", "what's the architecture?", "help me understand this codebase", "find all components that use Y", "trace the data flow from A to B", "where is feature Z handled", "I'm new to this code, where do…

shopwareLabs/ai-coding-tools · 121 tokens

dev-environment-bootstrapping

Use this skill when the user asks to bootstrap, set up, create, or initialize a Shopware development environment from scratch — phrases like "set up a Shopware dev environment", "clone and install Shopware", "initialize a Shopware plugin project", "bootstrap Shopware and a new plugin called X", "get a fresh Shopware…

shopwareLabs/ai-coding-tools · 144 tokens

phpunit-integration-to-unit-migrating

Use this skill ONLY when the user explicitly requests an audit, migration, or evaluation of whether a Shopware integration test belongs in the unit suite — trigger phrases like "audit integration tests", "migrate integration tests to unit", "is this an integration test or a unit test", "evaluate integration tests for…

shopwareLabs/ai-coding-tools · 152 tokens

cross-browser-typography-qa

Use this skill when web text looks clipped, flattened, wrapped incorrectly, misaligned, or materially different between Chromium and WebKit/Safari. Treat text rendering as both a geometry problem and a visual paint problem: passing DOM bounds does not prove that every glyph is intact.

AtlasOmnia/hermes-custom-pack · 56 tokens