Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/shopwarelabs/ai-coding-tools/researching-codenpx skills add shopwareLabs/ai-coding-tools --skill researching-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shopwareLabs/ai-coding-toolsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00121 | $0.03460 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.01730 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00692 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00346 |
Grade A, and why
researching-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 167 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Researching Code
Execute code research against the ChunkHound index and return synthesized findings. The skill picks the depth, sequences the queries, and returns the result.
Workflow
digraph researching_code {
"Skill invoked" [shape=doublecircle];
"Step 1: Detect depth and primitive directives" [shape=box];
"Depth?" [shape=diamond];
"Surface plan" [shape=box];
"Broad plan" [shape=box];
"Deep plan" [shape=box];
"Plan uses ChunkHound?" [shape=diamond];
"Step 2: Pre-flight (daemon_status)" [shape=box];
"All hard gates pass?" [shape=diamond];
"STOP — return structured failure" [shape=octagon, style=filled, fillcolor=red, fontcolor=white];
"Step 3: Execute plan" [shape=box];
"Step 4: Synthesize findings" [shape=box];
"Return result" [shape=doublecircle];
"Skill invoked" -> "Step 1: Detect depth and primitive directives";
"Step 1: Detect depth and primitive directives" -> "Depth?";
"Depth?" -> "Surface plan" [label="surface"];
"Depth?" -> "Broad plan" [label="broad"];
"Depth?" -> "Deep plan" [label="deep"];
"Surface plan" -> "Plan uses ChunkHound?";
"Broad plan" -> "Plan uses ChunkHound?";
"Deep plan" -> "Plan uses ChunkHound?";
"Plan uses ChunkHound?" -> "Step 2: Pre-flight (daemon_status)" [label="yes"];
"Plan uses ChunkHound?" -> "Step 3: Execute plan" [label="no — searches no code"];
"Step 2: Pre-flight (daemon_status)" -> "All hard gates pass?";
"All hard gates pass?" -> "STOP — return structured failure" [label="no"];
"All hard gates pass?" -> "Step 3: Execute plan" [label="yes"];
"Step 3: Execute plan" -> "Step 4: Synthesize findings";
"Step 4: Synthesize findings" -> "Return result";
}
Step 1: Detect depth and primitive directives
Pick surface, broad, or deep in this priority:
- Explicit directive from the caller — phrases like "quick check", "surface", "deep dive", "full trace", "just locate X". Use it verbatim.
- Question shape when no directive — surface for symbol-location questions ("Where is X defined?", "Is X used?", "Show me Y"); broad for subsystem questions ("How does Z work?", "What handles A?"); deep for multi-component traces, impact analyses, and full subsystem audits ("Trace data flow from A through B to C", "Audit all callers", "full impact map for refactoring X").
- Default: broad. Surface drops context; deep wastes time.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 167 lines · 121 tokens per session scan A 90ef9a782c64
researching-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository shopwareLabs/ai-coding-tools (42 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 121 tokens to every session and 3,460 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit-instructions
Audit locally-owned Claude Code instruction surfaces, including CLAUDE.md, .claude/rules, skill bodies, agent definitions, hook instruction text and output styles, for instructions current models no longer need (prior-model workarounds, over-prescriptive scaffolding, stale examples), instructions that misstate Claude…
audit-permission-state
Report the Claude Code permission state actually in effect. Discovers every settings scope (managed policy, user-global, project, local, and the pre-v2.1.211 start-directory copy), merges them into the effective allow/ask/deny set with each rule's source and precedence mechanic named, and classifies which allow rules…
lanes
Start, restart, stop, and check loop lanes as named background Claude Code sessions seeded from canonical prompt files, the scripted replacement for the manual morning refresh (cancel loop, clear, re-paste the canonical prompt) across N lanes on a machine. start/restart first pull the repo and refresh the plugin…
batch-simplify
Batch-run simplification across changed files, or across an entire repository, grouped by ecosystem and dependency order. Use when: 'batch simplify', 'simplify recent changes', 'simplify everything', 'forgot to run simplify', 'catch up on simplify', 'simplify my branch changes', 'simplify the whole repo', 'simplify…
audit-prompting-postures
Audit locally-owned instruction components, including skill bodies, agent definitions, hook instruction text, output styles, CLAUDE.md and rules, for MISSING posture guidance the official prompting guide says their purpose needs: delegation criteria/caps in orchestration components, minimal-scope and anti-test-gaming…
audit-install-state
Read-only audit of a Claude Code INSTALLATION directory, the machine-scope /.claude tree plus /.claude.json. Inventorying every file, separating what the product's own retention sweep already manages from what nothing manages, resolving what each number in a filename actually means before any process-liveness check…