Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/cross-repo-issuesnpx skills add JeremyDev87/codingbuddy --skill cross-repo-issuesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JeremyDev87/codingbuddyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/cross-repo-issues)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/cross-repo-issues"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/cross-repo-issues.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00045 | $0.01885 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00942 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00377 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00188 |
Grade A, and why
cross-repo-issues scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 258 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Cross-Repo Issue Creation
Overview
Not every issue belongs in the repository where it was discovered. Bugs in forked code belong upstream. Problems in a monorepo dependency belong in that dependency's repo. Filing issues in the wrong place wastes maintainer time and delays fixes.
Core principle: ALWAYS confirm the target repository with the user before creating an issue elsewhere. Never auto-create issues in repositories you don't own.
Iron Law:
NO CROSS-REPO ISSUE CREATION WITHOUT EXPLICIT USER CONFIRMATION
When to Use
- Bug discovered in forked code that should be reported upstream
- Issue in a monorepo sub-package that belongs in the package's source repo
- Bug in a third-party dependency that should be filed in the library's repo
- Feature request that affects an upstream project
- Security vulnerability that needs to be reported to the upstream maintainer
Use this ESPECIALLY when:
- Working in a fork and the bug exists in the original repo
- A monorepo package wraps an external library and the bug is in the library
- You need to coordinate fixes across multiple repositories
When NOT to Use
- Issue is local to the current repository (use normal issue workflow)
- You don't have access to the target repository
- The upstream project is archived or unmaintained
- Simple configuration issues that are project-specific
Configuration
Add upstreamRepos to your codingbuddy.config.json:
{
"upstreamRepos": {
".": "original-owner/original-repo",
"packages/ui": "design-system/ui-kit",
"dep:react": "facebook/react"
}
}
Key Conventions
| Key Pattern | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
"." |
Current repo is a fork of this upstream | "original-owner/repo" |
"packages/..." |
Monorepo package maps to external repo | "org/package-repo" |
"dep:<name>" |
npm/pip dependency maps to its source repo | "facebook/react" |
Minimal Configuration
For a simple fork, only one entry is needed:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 258 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A e9fb8dac29cc
cross-repo-issues is a skill published in the GitHub repository JeremyDev87/codingbuddy (31 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,885 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ring:searching-code
Forensic code search and analysis with optional Chain of Draft (CoD) ultra-concise mode. Five-phase methodology (clarification, planning, execution, analysis, synthesis) with severity assessment. Use for targeted investigation of specific patterns, bugs, or vulnerabilities. Skip for broad architecture mapping (use…
ring:exploring-codebases
Exploring a codebase across phases: scopes the target, detects architecture, components, and layers, deep-dives each discovered perspective, then synthesizes findings into actionable guidance with file:line evidence. Use to understand how a feature or system works before planning changes, or to orient on an unfamiliar…
ring:auditing-dependency-security
Auditing a dependency for supply-chain risk before install (pip/npm/go/cargo): checks typosquatting, maintainer/age risk, vulnerability DBs (OSV, GHSA, Socket), and lockfile hash pinning, then emits a risk score and approve/conditional/escalate/block decision. Use when adding or updating a dependency, reviewing a…
ring:checking-frontend-quality
Checking frontend quality against changed UI via ring:qa-frontend in accessibility, visual, e2e, or performance mode and aggregating pass/fail verdicts. Use when a frontend change needs standalone a11y, visual-snapshot, Playwright e2e, or Lighthouse/Core-Web-Vitals validation outside the dev cycle. Skip for…
bzdesignprompt
为前端或网页设计任务选择并下载合适的 DESIGN.md 模板。当用户需要网页设计模板、UI 风格参考、设计系统、落地页或前端界面设计时,浏览长亭百智云 UI 设计模板库,根据产品场景和视觉偏好匹配模板,并将完整 DESIGN.md 保存到项目中。.
verify-quality
Verify code quality including naming conventions, organization, documentation, and general best practices. Use when asked to "verify quality", "check code quality", or "review code organization".