Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LerianStudio/ring --skill committing-changesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LerianStudio/ringWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lerianstudio/ring/committing-changes)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lerianstudio/ring/committing-changes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lerianstudio/ring/committing-changes/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lerianstudio/ring/committing-changes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lerianstudio/ring/committing-changes.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Privilege Escalation · line 315 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.03281 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.01312 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00656 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00328 |
Grade A, and why
ring:committing-changes scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 394 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Analyze changes, enforce scope policy, group them into coherent atomic commits, and create signed commits following repository conventions. This skill transforms a messy working directory into a clean, logical commit history — with a scope that will actually pass PR validation.
⛔ HARD STOP — READ SCOPE POLICY BEFORE ANYTHING ELSE
The scope is REQUIRED in every commit message. It MUST come from the repo's allowlist.
MUST detect the allowlist in Step 0 before analyzing or drafting any commit message. A commit with an invented or omitted scope will fail PR validation and block the PR.
Step 0 — Detect Scope Policy
Many repos enforce an allowlist of valid scope values via a GitHub Actions workflow. Failing this check blocks the PR, so MUST detect it before proposing any commit message.
0.1 — Locate the policy file
Check in this order:
.github/workflows/pr-validation.yml(primary).github/workflows/pr-title.yml.github/workflows/commitlint.yml.github/workflows/semantic-pull-request.yml- Root configs:
commitlint.config.{js,cjs,mjs,ts},.commitlintrc*
0.2 — Extract the allowed scope list
Common forms to look for:
| Form | Example |
|---|---|
scopes: block (one per line) |
Under amannn/action-semantic-pull-request |
scopes: a,b,c inline |
Comma-separated on one line |
scope-enum rule |
In commitlint config arrays |
Also note any type restrictions — some repos limit types beyond the default Conventional Commits set.
0.3 — Apply the policy
| Situation | Required Action |
|---|---|
| Policy found, scope is clear | Use only scopes from the allowlist |
| Policy found, scope is ambiguous | STOP and ask the user which allowed scope to use |
| No policy file found | MUST still include a scope — ask the user what scope to use |
NEVER omit the scope. NEVER invent a scope not in the allowlist. A bare type: description is FORBIDDEN.
State the policy source and chosen scope to the user before proceeding.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 394 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 6ea09139d50d
ring:committing-changes is a skill published in the GitHub repository LerianStudio/ring (218 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 3,281 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review
Structured code review with parallel audit agents, confidence-scored triage, and optional auto-fix. Examines uncommitted changes, staged diffs, commit ranges, or specific paths. Produces a tiered report (MUST-FIX / RECOMMENDED / NIT) backed by evidence, then optionally applies fixes with verification.
incident
Incident response and postmortem generation from git/deploy context. When something breaks in production, this skill builds a timeline, identifies the probable cause, and generates a structured postmortem document. Flags: --since, --service, --sev, --revert, --comms, --dry-run.
worktree
Isolate work in a git worktree. Activates when the user needs branch isolation before executing a plan, wants a clean environment for a feature, is ready to finish work in an existing worktree, or wants to reclaim worktrees that accumulated and are now polluting filesystem-level measurement.
refactor-radar
Select refactor candidates with immutable git measurements, evidence-backed module families and temporary collision checks. Use for ranked refactor/test-debt triage, not implementation. DISCOVER saves reports without changing product code; REGISTER requires validated decisions. Worktree names are hints, test LOC is…
canary
Post-deploy monitoring with browser or degraded HTTP mode. Checks console errors, performance, page load. Configurable duration (1m-30m) and interval. Reports HEALTHY/DEGRADED/BROKEN. Flags: --duration, --interval, --quick, --max-errors.
release-docs
Diff-driven documentation sync after a release. Determines what source files changed, delegates changelog to zuvo:docs, updates only docs whose source changed. Flags: --dry-run, explicit range argument.