Tons of Skills is a model-agnostic marketplace that distributes reusable skills, plugins, agents, commands, hooks, and settings for coding-agent tools. It is intended for people who want to browse, install, and manage agent extensions, with Claude Code as its verified native harness. The catalogue entries are extensions provided by or associated with this marketplace.
Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplacenpx agentmods add skills/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/deployWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/deploy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/deploy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/deploy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/deploy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/deploy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 178 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 178 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.05000 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.02500 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01000 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00500 |
Grade A, and why
deploy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 350 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Deploy
No gate skipped, no failure ignored. If any gate fails, halt and report. Never --no-verify. Never bypass.
Failure recovery (rule 14). Worker errors and Quality Gate failures follow the canonical policy in skills/hyperflow/failure-recovery.md. Gate failures are user-surfaced, never auto-fixed — print the failing command + full stderr and halt the push. Never --no-verify, never force-push to main.
Per-Step Agent Map
| Step | Sub-phase | Workers | Reviewer | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1a | Repo-state scan | Worker A (git status), Worker B (git log) | Reviewer | — |
| 1b | Tool detection | Worker A (profile.md + lockfiles), Worker B (testing.md + devDeps) | Reviewer | — |
| 2a | Lint + typecheck (parallel) | Worker A (linter), Worker B (formatter), Worker C (tsc) | Reviewer | Step 3 (Security Sweep) runs in parallel with Step 2 at orchestrator level; 2a halts chain on any failure before 2b |
| 2b | Build gate | Worker A (prod build), Worker B (dev build) | Reviewer | Depends on 2a PASS |
| 2c | Test gate | Worker A (unit), Worker B (integration/E2E) | Reviewer | Parallel (P1); depends on 2b PASS |
| 3a | Secrets scan | Worker A (diff pattern), Worker B (file pattern) | security-reviewer |
Runs in parallel with Step 2 (pre-build; read-only) |
| 3b | Dependency audit | Worker A (CVE audit), Worker B (license check) | vulnerability-reviewer (web-research-first) |
— |
| 4 | Commit | single Worker | Reviewer | atomic-exempt (DOCTRINE 12.2) |
| 5a | Release execution | single Worker | Reviewer | atomic-exempt (DOCTRINE 12.2) |
| 5b | Version sync | Worker A (manifests), Worker B (changelog) | Reviewer | — |
| 6 | Push gate | AskUserQuestion | — | structural gate; atomic-exempt |
| 7 | Output | single print | — | atomic-exempt (§12.1) |
Step 1 — Survey State
Sub-phases run in parallel (P1).
Step 1a — Repo-state scan
Two Workers in parallel:
- Worker A —
git status --short— uncommitted changes, staged files - Worker B —
git log origin/<branch>..HEAD --oneline— commits ahead of remote; detect branch name
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 350 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 881feb162af1
deploy is a skill published in the GitHub repository jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace (2,717 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 5,000 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
verify-implementation
A workflow that runs a project’s verification skills to produce a report on coding patterns, architecture rules, and project conventions. It is intended for work after implementation, before a pull request, or during code review.
red-team-review
Unified adversarial review: v4.3 Strategic Matrix (MTA-004). 7-phase framework: Priors → Rubric → Adversarial Lenses → SWOT/TOWS → MCDA Decision Engine → Blind Spot/Kill Switch → Executive Summary. Absorbs: bias-detector.
codex-loop
Fix Elixir/Phoenix code until Codex CLI review comes back clean — bounded review, fix, verify loop before opening a PR. Use when codex is installed and you want an external cross-model critic on your changes before pushing.
codex-ab
Run an A/B codex review experiment — holistic codex review vs 3 focused dimension passes (security, ecto, liveview) on the branch diff, classify findings, report a panel-value verdict. Use when the branch is fresh, before any codex review runs.
include-test-files-that-assert-on-behavior-being-changed-in-decl
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
code-review-github
GitHub PR workflow orchestration for code review — list PRs, post comments, apply labels, and guarded auto-merge.