Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jessefmoore/offensive-claude-code --skill vulnerability-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jessefmoore/offensive-claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jessefmoore/offensive-claude-code/vulnerability-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jessefmoore/offensive-claude-code/vulnerability-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jessefmoore/offensive-claude-code/vulnerability-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jessefmoore/offensive-claude-code/vulnerability-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jessefmoore/offensive-claude-code/vulnerability-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01146 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00458 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00229 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00115 |
Grade A, and why
vulnerability-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
name: vulnerability-analysis description: Expert-level source code security auditing — taint analysis, memory safety, injection classes, auth flaws, crypto weaknesses, concurrency bugs, supply chain risks metadata: type: offensive phase: analysis
Vulnerability Analysis
Every vulnerability you miss is one an attacker can find. Systematic analysis traces untrusted data from source to sink, evaluates filters for bypass, and questions every trust boundary assumption.
When to Activate
- Reviewing any code for security vulnerabilities
- Auditing authentication, authorization, or session logic
- Evaluating input handling and output encoding
- Assessing cryptographic implementations
- Reviewing file operations, command execution, or deserialization
- Checking for race conditions in concurrent code
- Analyzing dependency security and supply chain risks
Core Methodology
Taint Analysis: Mark untrusted data at origin (source), track propagation to dangerous operations (sink). Vulnerability exists when tainted data reaches sink without adequate sanitization.
Source-Forward: Start from data entry points, trace every path to sinks. Comprehensive but time-consuming.
Sink-Backward: Start from dangerous operations (eval, exec, SQL, innerHTML), trace backward to sources. Faster and targeted.
Hybrid Approach: Sink-backward for rapid high-risk identification, then source-forward for complete coverage.
Rule Categories by Priority
| Priority | Category | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taint Analysis | CRITICAL |
| 2 | Memory Safety | CRITICAL |
| 3 | Injection Attacks | CRITICAL |
| 4 | Authentication & Authorization | HIGH |
| 5 | Cryptographic Vulnerabilities | HIGH |
| 6 | Concurrency & Race Conditions | HIGH |
| 7 | Web & API Security | MEDIUM-HIGH |
| 8 | Supply Chain & Dependencies | MEDIUM |
Audit Protocol
- Reconnaissance: Identify language, frameworks, trust boundaries, sensitive data, high-value targets. Establish threat model.
- Attack Surface Enumeration: Map all entry points — HTTP endpoints, CLI args, file inputs, IPC, deserialization points.
- Systematic Analysis: Apply hybrid taint analysis across all source-sink paths.
- False Positive Reduction:
- Trace validation chains upstream — is the value bounded before reaching sink?
- Confirm reachability — can attacker actually trigger this path?
- Evaluate against threat model — does exploitation require capabilities attacker doesn't have?
- Check for established patterns — recognized safe idioms in the domain?
- Exploitability Gate: Before reporting ANY finding:
- Are you certain this isn't expected functionality?
- Is this a valid vulnerability worth reporting?
- Is it actually exploitable in production?
- Findings: Document CWE, severity, root cause, exploitation scenario, remediation.
- Variant Hunting: Generalize each finding into a pattern and search for variants.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 115 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 8e0219d1fd50
vulnerability-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository jessefmoore/offensive-claude-code (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,146 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…