Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Jessinra/Lorekeeper --skill github-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jessinra/LorekeeperWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jessinra/lorekeeper/github-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jessinra/lorekeeper/github-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jessinra/lorekeeper/github-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jessinra/lorekeeper/github-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jessinra/lorekeeper/github-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.01385 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00554 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00277 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00138 |
Grade C, and why
github-code-review scanned grade C with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reaches for credential fileshighPrivilege escalation
SSH keys, cloud credentials, git-credentials, .npmrc, /etc/shadow: reading these is how a config file becomes a credential leak.
elif grep -q "github.com" ~/.git-credentials 2>/dev/null; then Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
See `references/reviewing-prs.md` for full curl/gh commands. How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 178 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GitHub Code Review
Perform code reviews on local changes before pushing, or review open PRs on GitHub.
Prerequisites
- Authenticated with GitHub (see
github-authskill) - Inside a git repository
Setup
if command -v gh &>/dev/null && gh auth status &>/dev/null; then
AUTH="gh"
else
AUTH="git"
if [ -z "$GITHUB_TOKEN" ]; then
if [ -f ~/.hermes/.env ] && grep -q "^GITHUB_TOKEN=" ~/.hermes/.env; then
GITHUB_TOKEN=$(grep "^GITHUB_TOKEN=" ~/.hermes/.env | head -1 | cut -d= -f2 | tr -d '\n\r')
elif grep -q "github.com" ~/.git-credentials 2>/dev/null; then
GITHUB_TOKEN=$(grep "github.com" ~/.git-credentials 2>/dev/null | head -1 | sed 's|https://[^:]*:\([^@]*\)@.*|\1|')
fi
fi
fi
REMOTE_URL=$(git remote get-url origin)
OWNER_REPO=$(echo "$REMOTE_URL" | sed -E 's|.*github\.com[:/]||; s|\.git$||')
OWNER=$(echo "$OWNER_REPO" | cut -d/ -f1)
REPO=$(echo "$OWNER_REPO" | cut -d/ -f2)
1. Reviewing Local Changes (Pre-Push)
Get the Diff
git diff --staged # staged changes
git diff main...HEAD # all changes vs main
git diff main...HEAD --name-only # file names only
git diff main...HEAD --stat # stat summary
Review Strategy
- Big picture:
git diff main...HEAD --stat+git log main..HEAD --oneline - File by file:
git diff main...HEAD -- src/auth/login.py+read_filefor context - Check for common issues:
git diff main...HEAD | grep -n "print(\|console\.log\|TODO\|FIXME\|HACK\|debugger" git diff main...HEAD --stat | sort -t'|' -k2 -rn | head -10 git diff main...HEAD | grep -in "password\|secret\|api_key\|token.*=\|private_key" git diff main...HEAD | grep -n "<<<<<<\|>>>>>>\|======="
Review Output Format
## Code Review Summary
### Critical
- **src/auth.py:45** — SQL injection: use parameterized queries.
### Warnings
- **src/models/user.py:23** — Password stored in plaintext.
### Suggestions
- **src/utils/helpers.py:8** — Duplicates logic in `src/core/utils.py:34`.
### Looks Good
- Clean separation of concerns in the middleware layer
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 178 lines · 18 tokens per session scan C cdd07c792aea
github-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jessinra/Lorekeeper (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,385 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it C with 2 findings (reaches for credential files, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
pre-pr
Prepare a Honcho change for a pull request to plastic-labs/honcho. Invoke before opening a PR, when drafting a PR body, when asked if a branch is PR-ready, or when filling the pull request template. Checks the linked issue, required tests and docs, then writes Description / Proofs / Fixes.
review-comments
Execute a feature-level review-comments cycle — aggregate unaddressed PR comments across every Feature.Repos PR, address or dismiss each one, and emit the standard handoff.
review-implementation-functionality-evidence
Implementation review Functionality/Evidence axis - audits plan satisfaction and verification evidence.
review-implementation-craft
Implementation review Craft axis - audits intrinsic code quality only.
review-implementation-cleanliness
Implementation review Cleanliness axis - audits change-set hygiene and pushability.
final-fix
Final-review fix pass that addresses requested changes and refreshes invalidated evidence.