Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to JHdehao/gemini-mem-v3. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/JHdehao/gemini-mem-v3/main/.claude/skills/gitnexus/gitnexus-impact-analysis/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JHdehao/gemini-mem-v3Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jhdehao/gemini-mem-v3/gitnexus-impact-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jhdehao/gemini-mem-v3/gitnexus-impact-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jhdehao/gemini-mem-v3/gitnexus-impact-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jhdehao/gemini-mem-v3/gitnexus-impact-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jhdehao/gemini-mem-v3/gitnexus-impact-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00784 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00314 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00157 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
gitnexus-impact-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to gitnexus-impact-analysis — 20 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Impact Analysis with GitNexus
When to Use
- "Is it safe to change this function?"
- "What will break if I modify X?"
- "Show me the blast radius"
- "Who uses this code?"
- Before making non-trivial code changes
- Before committing — to understand what your changes affect
Workflow
1. gitnexus_impact({target: "X", direction: "upstream"}) → What depends on this
2. READ gitnexus://repo/{name}/processes → Check affected execution flows
3. gitnexus_detect_changes() → Map current git changes to affected flows
4. Assess risk and report to user
If "Index is stale" → run
npx gitnexus analyzein terminal.
Checklist
- [ ] gitnexus_impact({target, direction: "upstream"}) to find dependents
- [ ] Review d=1 items first (these WILL BREAK)
- [ ] Check high-confidence (>0.8) dependencies
- [ ] READ processes to check affected execution flows
- [ ] gitnexus_detect_changes() for pre-commit check
- [ ] Assess risk level and report to user
Understanding Output
| Depth | Risk Level | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| d=1 | WILL BREAK | Direct callers/importers |
| d=2 | LIKELY AFFECTED | Indirect dependencies |
| d=3 | MAY NEED TESTING | Transitive effects |
Risk Assessment
| Affected | Risk |
|---|---|
| <5 symbols, few processes | LOW |
| 5-15 symbols, 2-5 processes | MEDIUM |
| >15 symbols or many processes | HIGH |
| Critical path (auth, payments) | CRITICAL |
Tools
gitnexus_impact — the primary tool for symbol blast radius:
gitnexus_impact({
target: "validateUser",
direction: "upstream",
minConfidence: 0.8,
maxDepth: 3
})
→ d=1 (WILL BREAK):
- loginHandler (src/auth/login.ts:42) [CALLS, 100%]
- apiMiddleware (src/api/middleware.ts:15) [CALLS, 100%]
→ d=2 (LIKELY AFFECTED):
- authRouter (src/routes/auth.ts:22) [CALLS, 95%]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 98 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A a4d6e8003c4a
gitnexus-impact-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository JHdehao/gemini-mem-v3 (1 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 784 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to gitnexus-impact-analysis, differing in 20 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
potpie-cli
Use when the task is centered on running, explaining, configuring, or troubleshooting the potpie command: doctor, login, pot management, source registration, resolve/search/record, graph workbench reads/writes, resource (document payload) commands, and pot scope behavior.
debugging-livekit-agents
Drives a multi-turn conversation with a LiveKit agent running locally to see what it does. Use when the user says "test my agent", "try my agent", "does this work", "why did it call that tool", "it says the wrong thing when I ask X", "test this change", or whenever you have edited an agent and need to check how it…
gcloud-usage
This skill should be used when user asks about "GCloud logs", "Cloud Logging queries", "Google Cloud metrics", "GCP observability", "trace analysis", or "debugging production issues on GCP".
chisle-audit
One-shot efficiency audit of a file, diff, or whole repo across BOTH axes at once: over-engineered code (reinvented stdlib, needless abstractions, speculative config) AND bloated prose (verbose comments, padded docstrings, redundant doc sections). Neither a pure code-minimizer nor a pure prose compressor does both in…
mongodb-query-optimizer
Help with MongoDB query optimization and indexing. Use only when the user asks for optimization or performance: "How do I optimize this query?", "How do I index this?", "Why is this query slow?", "Can you fix my slow queries?", "What are the slow queries on my cluster?", etc. Do not invoke for general MongoDB query…
frontend-testing-debugging
Use when testing, debugging, or making targeted improvements to rendered frontend apps through the Frontend Design Skills or web dev plugin: local dev servers, UI regressions, interaction bugs, console errors, responsive layout, and visual QA. Check whether the Browser plugin is available and use it first when it is…