Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to jigglypop/gaesup-world. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jigglypop/gaesup-world/master/.claude/skills/verify/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jigglypop/gaesup-worldWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jigglypop/gaesup-world/verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jigglypop/gaesup-world/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jigglypop/gaesup-world/verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jigglypop/gaesup-world/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jigglypop/gaesup-world/verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00507 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00253 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00101 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
검증 사다리
싼 것부터 비싼 것 순서로, 변경 반경에 맞는 단계까지 올라간다. 상위 단계 통과가 하위 단계를 포함하지 않으므로 건너뛰지 말 것.
0단계 — 항상 (모든 코드 변경)
pnpm exec tsc -p tsconfig.build.json --noEmit # src 타입체크 (typecheck 스크립트 없음)
pnpm exec eslint <변경 파일들> # 변경 파일만! 저장소 전체는 기존 실패 ~3457건
1단계 — 도메인 로직 변경
pnpm test -- src/core/<domain> --runInBand
메모리/누수 관련 코드를 건드렸으면: pnpm test:memory (runInBand 내장).
2단계 — 공개 API / 엔트리 / export 변경
corepack pnpm test -- src/__tests__/publicApi.test.ts --runInBand
corepack pnpm test -- src/__tests__/packageExports.test.ts --runInBand
pnpm build:types
examples를 건드렸으면 pnpm exec tsc --noEmit (examples 포함 타입체크)도 실행.
3단계 — 릴리스 전 / 대규모 변경
pnpm verify # lint + test(runInBand) + build:types + publint — lint 단계는 기존 실패로 빨간불일 수 있음을 감안
pnpm verify:full # + 빌드 후 패키지 소비 테스트(test:package) + 데모 청크 검증(test:demo)
브라우저 스모크가 필요하면: pnpm test:browser (Playwright chromium 설치 포함, 오래 걸림).
보고 규칙
- 실패하면 실패 출력을 그대로 보고한다. "될 것"이라는 추정으로 성공을 보고하지 않는다.
- 기존(pre-existing) 실패와 이번 변경으로 생긴 실패를 구분해서 보고한다. 애매하면
git stash후 동일 명령으로 기준선을 잰다.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 48 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 80ec173d370d
verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository jigglypop/gaesup-world (22 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 507 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.