Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jmagly/aiwg --skill aiwg-regenerate-copilotgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmagly/aiwgWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/aiwg-regenerate-copilot)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/aiwg-regenerate-copilot"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmagly/aiwg/aiwg-regenerate-copilot/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/aiwg-regenerate-copilot"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmagly/aiwg/aiwg-regenerate-copilot.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Prompt Injection · line 45 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
- high Prompt Injection · line 115 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.02116 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01058 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00423 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00212 |
Grade A, and why
aiwg-regenerate-copilot scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 297 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Regenerate copilot-instructions.md
Regenerate the .github/copilot-instructions.md file for GitHub Copilot integration, analyzing current project state while preserving team directives and organizational requirements.
Hook file approach (default): Generates AIWG-copilot.md and adds @AIWG-copilot.md directive to copilot-instructions.md if @-link is supported. Note: Copilot @-link support is unverified — defaults to full inject until confirmed (see #444).
Full inject (--full-inject): Embeds AIWG content inline with AIWG markers.
Vendor-specific filtering: This command includes ONLY GitHub Copilot patterns and agent references, reducing context pollution. Other vendor content is referenced but not inlined.
Core Principle
Team content is preserved. AIWG content is updated. Only Copilot-specific content is inlined.
Parameters
| Flag | Description |
|---|---|
--no-backup |
Skip creating backup file |
--dry-run |
Preview changes without writing |
--show-preserved |
List all detected preserved content and exit |
--full |
Full regeneration, preserve nothing (destructive) |
Execution Steps
Step 1: Create Backup
Unless --no-backup specified:
- Check if
.github/copilot-instructions.mdexists - If exists, copy to
.github/copilot-instructions.md.backup-{YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS} - Report backup location
Step 2: Extract Preserved Content
Same preservation patterns as other platforms:
- Explicit Preserve Blocks:
<!-- PRESERVE -->...<!-- /PRESERVE --> - Preserved Section Headings: Team *, Org *, Definition of Done, etc.
- Inline Directives: Lines with directive keywords
Step 3: Analyze Project
- Languages and package managers
- Development commands
- Test framework
- CI/CD configuration (especially
.github/workflows/) - Directory structure
- Existing
.github/agents/configuration
Step 4: Detect AIWG State
Check installed frameworks by scanning:
.github/agents/for custom agents (YAML format).github/copilot/for Copilot configuration.github/workflows/for CI/CD workflows
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 297 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A f64fa9fc1935
aiwg-regenerate-copilot is a skill published in the GitHub repository jmagly/aiwg (210 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 2,116 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
surge
Use when a user provides a PRD, spec, or detailed requirements document and needs a full project delivered through iterative expert orchestration — multi-round analyze/research/design/implement/QA cycles with convergence detection. NOT for: single-file edits, quick prototypes, simple Q&A, or tasks without a written…
goal-writer
Drafts a goal+rider document pair that briefs an autonomous coding agent on one round of work — a goal file under 4,000 characters (sized to fit the /goal command in both Claude Code and Codex) plus an unbounded rider with phased plans and named depth tests. Use when the user says "draft a goal", "write a goal+rider"…
horizon
Run a durable Horizon workflow for a multi-feature goal with bounded autonomous retries and an audit trail.
check-in
Record a Parallax protocol checkpoint with concrete evidence before gated implementation work.
debug
Perform an evidence-based Parallax diagnosis or post-build audit and verify the repair.
hyperplan
Harden a non-trivial plan through a three-round adversarial critique and evidence-based synthesis.