Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/jmrplens/gitlab-mcp-server/increase-test-coveragenpx skills add jmrplens/gitlab-mcp-server --skill increase-test-coveragegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmrplens/gitlab-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmrplens/gitlab-mcp-server/increase-test-coverage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmrplens/gitlab-mcp-server/increase-test-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmrplens/gitlab-mcp-server/increase-test-coverage.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00072 | $0.03384 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01692 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00677 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00338 |
Grade A, and why
increase-test-coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 417 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Increase Test Coverage
Primary Directive
Systematically increase Go test coverage to 90%+ per package using a structured Research → Plan → Implement pipeline. Generate comprehensive, buildable, passing tests that follow project conventions and use proper mocks for external dependencies.
All tests must:
- Compile and pass on the first run
- Use existing test helpers and patterns found in the codebase
- Mock external dependencies (GitLab API) via
httptest - Follow table-driven test patterns with
t.Run()subtests - Cover happy paths, edge cases, and error scenarios
- Include documentation (doc comment) explaining what each test validates and why
- Be verified against false passes (assertions that never fail)
- Be written in English per project language policy
Execution Context
This skill is designed for the Test Expert agent or any agent tasked with increasing test coverage. It operates on Go codebases that use the standard testing package, net/http/httptest, and optionally testify/assert.
Pipeline Overview
flowchart TD
start[Increase test coverage]
research[Research\nMeasure coverage and analyze gaps]
plan[Plan\nPrioritize gaps by package]
implement[Implement\nWrite tests per phase]
build[Build\ngolangci-lint and go build]
test[Test\ngo test]
fix[Fix\nRepair errors]
start --> research --> plan --> implement
implement --> build
implement --> test
implement --> fix
fix --> build
fix --> test
Phase 1: Research
Thoroughly analyze the codebase and measure current coverage before writing any tests.
Step 1: Measure Baseline Coverage
Run coverage analysis for the entire project:
go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...
go tool cover -func=coverage.out
Record the per-package and per-function coverage percentages. This is the baseline.
Step 2: Generate HTML Coverage Report (Optional)
go tool cover -html=coverage.out -o coverage.html
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 417 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A c04f73db35d3
increase-test-coverage is a skill published in the GitHub repository jmrplens/gitlab-mcp-server (31 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 3,384 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
browser-use
Direct browser control via CDP for web interaction: automation, scraping, testing, screenshots, and site/app work.
open-source
Documentation reference for writing Python code using the browser-use open-source library. Use this skill whenever the user needs help with Agent, Browser, or Tools configuration, is writing code that imports from browseruse, asks about @sandbox deployment, supported LLM models, Actor API, custom tools, lifecycle…
kayba-stage-5-action-plan
Triage each insight into discard/code-fix/prompt-fix and produce a prioritized action plan with specific recommendations. Trigger when the user says "run stage 5", "make action plan", "triage skills", or when invoked by the kayba-pipeline orchestrator. Requires eval outputs from stages 1-4.
kayba-stage-2-domain-context
Gather domain context about the repository and agent — system prompt, tool definitions, domain docs, and behavior patterns from traces. Trigger when the user says "run stage 2", "gather context", "domain context", or when invoked by the kayba-pipeline orchestrator.
playwright-screen-recording
Record browser test videos with Playwright for PR review and bug fix verification.
kayba-stage-1-api-analysis
Fetch pre-computed insights from the Kayba API and build a structured summary. Does NOT upload traces or trigger generation — analysis is assumed to already exist. Trigger when the user says "run stage 1", "get insights", "fetch skills", "kayba analyze", or when invoked by the kayba-pipeline orchestrator. Requires the…