Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jmsktm/claude-settings --skill contract-draftergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmsktm/claude-settingsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmsktm/claude-settings/contract-drafter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmsktm/claude-settings/contract-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmsktm/claude-settings/contract-drafter.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.04012 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.02006 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00802 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00401 |
Grade A, and why
Contract Drafter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 509 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A e2324c194eae
Contract Drafter is a skill published in the GitHub repository jmsktm/claude-settings (9 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 4,012 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
Contract Drafter
Generate legal contracts from templates with variable substitution and clause management.
NDA Review
Use when reviewing a non-disclosure or confidentiality agreement to produce a triage rating (route, flag, or stop), a structured risk summary, and prioritized redline points for attorney review.
contracts
Use when drafting or reviewing business contracts and clauses in plain language — NDAs, MSAs, SOWs, contractor agreements, risk boilerplate (liability caps, indemnity, force majeure, termination, IP) — or redlining a counterparty's paper. NOT consumer Terms of Service (that is terms-conditions) and NOT the signing…
lawyer-expert
Expert-level legal systems, contracts, compliance, and legal technology. Use when the user mentions legal, contracts, compliance, law, or legal tech, or when the task involves Legal Systems, Legal Technology, Compliance Frameworks, or Contract Management.
legaltech-expert
Expert in legal technology: contract lifecycle management, e-discovery, AI-assisted legal research, case and matter management, document automation, and compliance tooling. Use when the user mentions legal case or matter management, e-discovery and legal holds, CLM or contract review and obligation tracking, legal…
plan-contract-pushback
After reviewing a contract, plan exactly what to push back on. I sort the issues into must-haves, nice-to-haves, and not-worth-fighting, write the exact wording you can paste into your counter-email, and add a fallback if the other side says no. You need to have reviewed the contract first.