Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot/coding-standardsnpx skills add jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot --skill coding-standardsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilotWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00043 | $0.01369 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00685 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00274 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
coding-standards scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to coding-standards — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Coding Standards
D9 Canonical Reference. This is the single source of truth for cross-language coding standards. Language-specific reviewers (
@typescript-reviewer,@python-reviewer, etc.) embed these rules. Agents cite this skill as "See also: /coding-standards."
Naming Conventions
Variables & Functions
| Language | Variables | Functions | Constants |
|---|---|---|---|
| TypeScript / JavaScript | camelCase |
camelCase |
SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE |
| Python | snake_case |
snake_case |
SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE |
| Go | camelCase |
camelCase |
CamelCase (exported) |
| Rust | snake_case |
snake_case |
SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE |
| Java | camelCase |
camelCase |
SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE |
| C# | camelCase |
PascalCase |
PascalCase |
| Swift | camelCase |
camelCase |
camelCase |
Classes / Types / Interfaces
PascalCase — all languages, no exceptions.
Booleans
Prefix with is, has, can, should: isLoading, hasError, canEdit, shouldRefresh.
Collections
Plural nouns: users, errors, items — not userList, errorArray.
Avoid
- Single-letter variables outside loop counters (
i,j,kare OK in loops) - Abbreviations that save under 3 characters:
usr→user,mgr→manager - Redundant type names:
UserInterface,UserClass,UserObject→ justUser
Function Design
- Max length: 50 lines (firm guideline; > 80 lines is always a split target)
- Single responsibility: one function, one job — if "and" appears in the description, split it
- Max parameters: 3; beyond that, use an options/config object
- Cyclomatic complexity: ≤ 10; > 15 is a mandatory refactor target
- Nesting depth: ≤ 3 levels; use early returns to flatten
Early Return Pattern (preferred)
// BEFORE — deep nesting
function handle(input) {
if (input) {
if (input.valid) {
return process(input);
}
}
return null;
}
// AFTER — early returns
function handle(input) {
if (!input || !input.valid) return null;
return process(input);
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 145 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 669714e3c002
coding-standards is a skill published in the GitHub repository jmstar85/oh-my-githubcopilot (153 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,369 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to coding-standards, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…