gitscape.ai: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/git-workflow-and-versioning/SKILL.md

git-workflow-and-versioning is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from jmxt3/gitscape.ai. It costs 40 tokens per session (2,438 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of git-workflow-and-versioning, Apache-2.0.

A set of Git practices for organizing code changes and preserving a clear project history. Git is a tool that records versions of files so changes can be reviewed, shared, or reversed.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when branching, committing, merging, resolving conflicts, or organizing work so the main branch stays deployable and changes remain small and understandable.
Why use it?
It makes fast or parallel code changes easier to track, review, merge, and undo.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is jmxt3/gitscape.ai's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on gitscape.ai itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything gitscape.ai configures →

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is git worktree add ../project-feature-a feature/task-creation.

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to jmxt3/gitscape.ai. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jmxt3/gitscape.ai/main/.agents/skills/git-workflow-and-versioning/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmxt3/gitscape.ai

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for git-workflow-and-versioning

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmxt3/gitscape.ai/git-workflow-and-versioning.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmxt3/gitscape.ai/git-workflow-and-versioning)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmxt3/gitscape.ai/git-workflow-and-versioning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmxt3/gitscape.ai/git-workflow-and-versioning.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 40 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,438 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00040 $0.02438
Opus 5 $0.00020 $0.01219
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00488
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00244

Measured 8d ago against content hash b1a84eac7a47, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

git-workflow-and-versioning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to git-workflow-and-versioning — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/skills/git-workflow-and-versioning/SKILL.md · 301 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 301 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Git Workflow and Versioning

Overview

Git is your safety net. Treat commits as save points, branches as sandboxes, and history as documentation. With AI agents generating code at high speed, disciplined version control is the mechanism that keeps changes manageable, reviewable, and reversible.

When to Use

Always. Every code change flows through git.

Core Principles

Trunk-Based Development (Recommended)

Keep main always deployable. Work in short-lived feature branches that merge back within 1-3 days. Long-lived development branches are hidden costs — they diverge, create merge conflicts, and delay integration. DORA research consistently shows trunk-based development correlates with high-performing engineering teams.

main ──●──●──●──●──●──●──●──●──●──  (always deployable)
        ╲      ╱  ╲    ╱
         ●──●─╱    ●──╱    ← short-lived feature branches (1-3 days)

This is the recommended default. Teams using gitflow or long-lived branches can adapt the principles (atomic commits, small changes, descriptive messages) to their branching model — the commit discipline matters more than the specific branching strategy.

  • Dev branches are costs. Every day a branch lives, it accumulates merge risk.
  • Release branches are acceptable. When you need to stabilize a release while main moves forward.
  • Feature flags > long branches. Prefer deploying incomplete work behind flags rather than keeping it on a branch for weeks.

1. Commit Early, Commit Often

Each successful increment gets its own commit. Don't accumulate large uncommitted changes.

Work pattern:
  Implement slice → Test → Verify → Commit → Next slice

Not this:
  Implement everything → Hope it works → Giant commit

Commits are save points. If the next change breaks something, you can revert to the last known-good state instantly.

2. Atomic Commits

Each commit does one logical thing:

# Good: Each commit is self-contained
git log --oneline
a1b2c3d Add task creation endpoint with validation
d4e5f6g Add task creation form component
h7i8j9k Connect form to API and add loading state
m1n2o3p Add task creation tests (unit + integration)

# Bad: Everything mixed together
git log --oneline
x1y2z3a Add task feature, fix sidebar, update deps, refactor utils

Read the full file on GitHub · 301 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 301 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A b1a84eac7a47

Subscribe to this mod's changes

git-workflow-and-versioning is a skill published in the GitHub repository jmxt3/gitscape.ai (33 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 2,438 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to git-workflow-and-versioning, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.