openwiki-proposal-drafting

openwiki-proposal-drafting is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from joe-broadhead/open-cowork. It costs 31 tokens per session (333 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A skill for drafting OpenWiki proposals from retrieved evidence, links, or inbox material. OpenWiki is a knowledge system where proposed page changes are reviewed before being applied.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to create focused, reviewable page proposals with evidence, identifiers, Markdown content, and suggested-link details.
Why use it?
It preserves the records and sources that support a proposed change and keeps human review in the process.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Which agent this was written for is unclear — built for openclaw. Also seen: built for openclaw; mentions OpenCode.

Good fit Use it to create focused, reviewable page proposals with evidence, identifiers, Markdown content, and suggested-link details.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/joe-broadhead/open-cowork/openwiki-proposal-drafting
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add joe-broadhead/open-cowork --skill openwiki-proposal-drafting
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/joe-broadhead/open-cowork

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for openwiki-proposal-drafting

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/joe-broadhead/open-cowork/openwiki-proposal-drafting/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/joe-broadhead/open-cowork/openwiki-proposal-drafting)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/joe-broadhead/open-cowork/openwiki-proposal-drafting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/joe-broadhead/open-cowork/openwiki-proposal-drafting/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for openwiki-proposal-drafting

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/joe-broadhead/open-cowork/openwiki-proposal-drafting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/joe-broadhead/open-cowork/openwiki-proposal-drafting.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 31 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 333 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00031 $0.00333
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.00167
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00067
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00033

Measured 10d ago against content hash ddf24980c334, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

openwiki-proposal-drafting scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

products/wiki/integrations/opencode/skills/openwiki-proposal-drafting/SKILL.md · 26 lines

What it actually says

OpenWiki Proposal Drafting

Use this skill when a change should be staged for human review.

Required behavior:

  • Search and read existing records before drafting.
  • Preserve page IDs, source IDs, claim IDs, proposal IDs, and inbox IDs in rationale text when they justify the change.
  • Draft focused proposals. Prefer one proposal per page-sized change.
  • Keep canonical page bodies in Markdown and let OpenWiki render frontmatter.
  • Use schema-pack guidance as constraints, not as permission to bypass repository validation.
  • After every proposal, read the proposal detail and report validation status, target path, and any warnings.
  • Do not apply proposals unless the user explicitly authorizes trusted write mode.

When link extraction suggests an edge, include the extraction rule and confidence in the rationale or a suggested-links section so reviewers can distinguish explicit links from derived ones.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 26 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A ddf24980c334

Subscribe to this mod's changes

openwiki-proposal-drafting is a skill published in the GitHub repository joe-broadhead/open-cowork (11 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 333 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.