requesting-code-review

requesting-code-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from john-data-chen/hermes-agent-backup. It costs 20 tokens per session (2,128 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of requesting-code-review, MIT.

A pre-commit verification process that checks your recent code changes with security scans, quality gates, and an independent review. It can run an auto-fix cycle before changes are committed or pushed.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after implementing a feature or bug fix, especially before committing, pushing, or merging changes in a Git repository.
Why use it?
It catches mistakes that the original author may overlook and provides a check before code reaches a shared branch. It also helps separate reviewing your own changes from reviewing someone else's pull request.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it after implementing a feature or bug fix, especially before committing, pushing, or merging changes in a Git repository.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/john-data-chen/hermes-agent-backup/requesting-code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add john-data-chen/hermes-agent-backup --skill requesting-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/john-data-chen/hermes-agent-backup

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for requesting-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/john-data-chen/hermes-agent-backup/requesting-code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/john-data-chen/hermes-agent-backup/requesting-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/john-data-chen/hermes-agent-backup/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/john-data-chen/hermes-agent-backup/requesting-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for requesting-code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/john-data-chen/hermes-agent-backup/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/john-data-chen/hermes-agent-backup/requesting-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 20 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,128 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 94% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00020 $0.02128
Opus 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00851
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00426
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00213

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 1126afb626b3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

requesting-code-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Runs shell commandslowCapability

Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.

os.system(f"ls {user_input}")
Origin

This is a copy

94% identical to requesting-code-review — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/software-development/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md · 281 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 281 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Pre-Commit Code Verification

Automated verification pipeline before code lands. Static scans, baseline-aware quality gates, an independent reviewer subagent, and an auto-fix loop.

Core principle: No agent should verify its own work. Fresh context finds what you miss.

When to Use

  • After implementing a feature or bug fix, before git commit or git push
  • When user says "commit", "push", "ship", "done", "verify", or "review before merge"
  • After completing a task with 2+ file edits in a git repo
  • After each task in subagent-driven-development (the two-stage review)

Skip for: documentation-only changes, pure config tweaks, or when user says "skip verification".

This skill vs github-code-review: This skill verifies YOUR changes before committing. github-code-review reviews OTHER people's PRs on GitHub with inline comments.

Step 1 — Get the diff

git diff --cached

If empty, try git diff then git diff HEAD~1 HEAD.

If git diff --cached is empty but git diff shows changes, tell the user to git add <files> first. If still empty, run git status — nothing to verify.

If the diff exceeds 15,000 characters, split by file:

git diff --name-only
git diff HEAD -- specific_file.py

Step 2 — Static security scan

Scan added lines only. Any match is a security concern fed into Step 5.

# Hardcoded secrets
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -iE "(api_key|secret|password|token|passwd)\s*=\s*['\"][^'\"]{6,}['\"]"

# Shell injection
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "os\.system\(|subprocess.*shell=True"

# Dangerous eval/exec
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "\beval\(|\bexec\("

# Unsafe deserialization
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "pickle\.loads?\("

# SQL injection (string formatting in queries)
git diff --cached | grep "^+" | grep -E "execute\(f\"|\.format\(.*SELECT|\.format\(.*INSERT"

Step 3 — Baseline tests and linting

Detect the project language and run the appropriate tools. Capture the failure count BEFORE your changes as baseline_failures (stash changes, run, pop). Only NEW failures introduced by your changes block the commit.

Read the full file on GitHub · 281 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 281 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 1126afb626b3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

requesting-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository john-data-chen/hermes-agent-backup (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 2,128 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). It is 94% identical to requesting-code-review, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

code-review

Reviews code diffs and files for security vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10), error handling, complexity, naming conventions, and performance issues. Use when the user asks to review a PR, pull request, diff, merge request, or code changes.

open-gitagent/opengap · 53 tokens

check-vercel-rules

Explicit Codex workflow: Run the packaged Vercel Labs agent-skills rule audit on the current project.

Lykhoyda/rn-dev-agent · 28 tokens

adk-review

Reviews the uncommitted changes in an adk-python working tree and reports correctness, design, public-API stability, test, sample and documentation gaps as a prioritized findings report, fixing them only when asked. Use when the user asks to review local changes, wants a self-review before opening a pull request, asks…

google/adk-python · 164 tokens

code-review-skill

Reviews code with feedback tailored to the developer's profile in session state.

google/adk-python · 19 tokens

learn-from-sage

Detection-gap (miss) analysis for Code Review Sage. Learn from shipped fixes, acted-on human comments, and design outcomes to close reviewer blind spots. Inline during review stages a candidate; a human triggers a one-shot AI consolidation into the live ruleset.

kirodotdev/KiroCrew · 56 tokens

pr-writing-review

Extract and analyze writing improvements from GitHub PR review comments. Use when asked to show review feedback, style changes, or editorial improvements from a GitHub pull request URL. Handles both explicit suggestions and plain text feedback. Produces structured output comparing original phrasing with reviewer…

evalstate/fast-agent · 64 tokens