Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add johnqtcg/awesome-skills --skill readme-generatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/johnqtcg/awesome-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/johnqtcg/awesome-skills/readme-generator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/johnqtcg/awesome-skills/readme-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/johnqtcg/awesome-skills/readme-generator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/johnqtcg/awesome-skills/readme-generator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/johnqtcg/awesome-skills/readme-generator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 346 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.05142 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.02571 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.01028 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00514 |
Grade A, and why
readme-generator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 387 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
README Generator
Generate high-quality README documents from codebase evidence, with clear structure, runnable commands, and maintenance rules.
Core Rules
- Base every statement on repository evidence (files, code, scripts, workflows, configs).
- Keep internal workflow reporting out of the README body. Evidence maps, scorecards, and verification state belong in the assistant response — see §Command Verifiability Gate.
- Exclude local/private tooling folders by default (for example
.codex/) unless asked. - Keep naming and paths consistent with the real repository layout.
- Treat top-level
README.mdas a user-facing homepage first, a maintainer reference second.
Evidence Precedence (resolves "omit or mark?")
One rule, applied by section class — there is no third case:
| Section class | Evidence present | Evidence missing |
|---|---|---|
| Required for the project type (§Structure Policy) | Write it | Keep the heading, write Not found in repo |
| Optional (§Optional Sections) | Write it | Omit entirely and list it in sections_omitted |
Facts vs Results (resolves "is this command fabricated?")
A manifest proves a toolchain; only an artifact proves a result.
- Evidence-backed:
go test ./...whengo.modexists,pytestwhenpyproject.tomlexists,make <target>when that exact target is in the Makefile. - Not evidence-backed: coverage percentages, test counts, benchmark numbers, throughput,
latency, or a response body — unless the repo commits the artifact they come from
(a checked-in
benchstatoutput, a golden fixture, a committed coverage report). - A config file proves a target, never a measurement.
.codecov.ymlwithtarget: 80%licenses "the coverage target is 80%", not "coverage is 80%" — the latter asserts a result the repo does not record. The linter enforces that split. - If a repo has a manifest but no test files, still show the toolchain command and add
No test files found in repo— the command is real, the coverage claim would not be.
What ships with it
57 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/anti-examples.md 3.9 KB
- references/badges-and-governance.md 3.5 KB
- references/bilingual-guidelines.md 1.1 KB
- references/checklist.md 11 KB
- references/command-priority.md 13 KB
- references/golden-cli.md 3.0 KB
- references/golden-examples.md 9.1 KB
- references/golden-library.md 3.7 KB
- references/golden-lightweight.md 1.6 KB
- references/golden-monorepo.md 3.1 KB
- references/golden-service.md 4.9 KB
- references/language-snippets.md 4.5 KB
- references/monorepo-rules.md 1.6 KB
- references/templates.md 11 KB
- scripts/discover_readme_needs.sh 22 KB runs code
- scripts/lint_readme.py 47 KB runs code
- scripts/run_live_eval.sh 4.4 KB runs code
- scripts/run_regression.sh 2.2 KB runs code
- scripts/tests/COVERAGE.md 15 KB
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/go_service/bad.md 1.0 KB
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/go_service/expect.json 724 B
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/go_service/good.md 1.7 KB
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/go_service/repo.json 1.7 KB
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/lightweight_tool/bad.md 211 B
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/lightweight_tool/expect.json 545 B
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/lightweight_tool/good.md 692 B
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/lightweight_tool/repo.json 965 B
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/node_cli/bad.md 481 B
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/node_cli/expect.json 689 B
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/node_cli/good.md 1.1 KB
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/node_cli/repo.json 916 B
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/py_library/bad.md 329 B
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/py_library/expect.json 590 B
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/py_library/good.md 846 B
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/py_library/repo.json 1021 B
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/rust_workspace/bad.md 146 B
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/rust_workspace/expect.json 574 B
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/rust_workspace/good.md 1.1 KB
- scripts/tests/forward_eval/rust_workspace/repo.json 1.0 KB
- scripts/tests/golden_repos/cli.json 492 B
- scripts/tests/golden_repos/library.json 713 B
- scripts/tests/golden_repos/lightweight.json 410 B
- scripts/tests/golden_repos/monorepo.json 992 B
- scripts/tests/golden_repos/service.json 1.3 KB
- scripts/tests/golden/001_go_service_full.json 1.3 KB
- scripts/tests/golden/002_go_library.json 1.1 KB
- scripts/tests/golden/003_cli_tool.json 1.1 KB
- scripts/tests/golden/004_monorepo.json 1.1 KB
- scripts/tests/golden/005_lightweight_internal.json 1.2 KB
- scripts/tests/golden/006_private_service.json 878 B
- scripts/tests/golden/007_chinese_readme.json 1.0 KB
- scripts/tests/golden/008_refactor_stale_readme.json 1.2 KB
- scripts/tests/golden/009_degraded_no_build.json 931 B
- scripts/tests/test_discovery_script.py 23 KB runs code
- scripts/tests/test_forward_eval.py 46 KB runs code
- scripts/tests/test_golden_scenarios.py 10 KB runs code
- scripts/tests/test_skill_contract.py 40 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 387 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 8545d5408bd3
readme-generator is a skill published in the GitHub repository johnqtcg/awesome-skills (30 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 5,142 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
security-compliance
Guides security professionals in implementing defense-in-depth security architectures, achieving compliance with industry frameworks (SOC2, ISO27001, GDPR, HIPAA), conducting threat modeling and risk assessments, managing security operations and incident response, and embedding security throughout the SDLC.
stride-analysis-patterns
Apply STRIDE methodology to systematically identify threats. Use when analyzing system security, conducting threat modeling sessions, or creating security documentation.
cache-components
Expert guidance for Next.js Cache Components and Partial Prerendering (PPR). PROACTIVE ACTIVATION: Use this skill automatically when working in Next.js projects that have cacheComponents: true in their next.config.ts/next.config.js. When this config is detected, proactively apply Cache Components patterns and best…
manage-skills
A maintenance workflow for checking whether project verification skills still cover the code and rules that changed during a session.
blind-spot-pass
Use before starting work in a domain you don't know well, to surface the "unknown unknowns" — the things you don't even know to ask about — and learn just enough to prompt and decide well. Implements the "blind spot pass" pattern from Anthropic's Fable "finding your unknowns" field guide. Triggers when you say "I'm…
skill-factory
A workflow that examines completed session work and turns reusable patterns into Claude Code skills.