Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jonashertner/opencaselaw --skill evidence-bundlegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jonashertner/opencaselawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jonashertner/opencaselaw/evidence-bundle)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jonashertner/opencaselaw/evidence-bundle"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jonashertner/opencaselaw/evidence-bundle/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jonashertner/opencaselaw/evidence-bundle"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jonashertner/opencaselaw/evidence-bundle.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00372 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00186 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
evidence-bundle scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Evidence bundles with ocl
Use when a deliverable relies on decisions or statutes and someone will review it later (a memo, a brief, an answer with legal authorities).
- Collect:
ocl bundle create '<query>' --max-results <n> --passage <e-number> --law <ABBR:ART> --out <folder>saves every served response (JSON and plain text), a plain-languageINDEX.mdandmanifest.jsonwith requests, timestamps, source links and SHA-256 hashes.--court,--language,--date-from/--date-tonarrow the selection; cantonal statutes take--law ZH/GOG:1. - Add decisions found elsewhere:
ocl bundle add <folder> <decision_id> ... --passage <n>. - Verify before handing over:
ocl bundle verify <folder>(exit 0 only when every listed file is intact). Compare two runs of the same question:ocl bundle diff <old> <new>. - Report the bundle path,
completeness(anunavailableitem is one the service does not have; afailedone is retried with--resume), and thecorpus_snapshot.db_generationthe answers came from.
Rules: the bundle is what was served, not an assessment of legal support;
never edit files inside it; cite from INDEX.md's labels, which are the
service's citation strings.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 27 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 5fabf1156c51
evidence-bundle is a skill published in the GitHub repository jonashertner/opencaselaw (63 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 372 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other skills, from other repositories
legaltech-expert
Expert in legal technology: contract lifecycle management, e-discovery, AI-assisted legal research, case and matter management, document automation, and compliance tooling. Use when the user mentions legal case or matter management, e-discovery and legal holds, CLM or contract review and obligation tracking, legal…
legalize-kr
Use this skill when working with Legalize-KR public Korean legal data, including laws, court precedents, administrative rules, and local ordinances. It guides agents to choose between legalize-cli, the local stdio legalize MCP server, git clone workflows, and direct GitHub access for search, retrieval, article lookup…
contract-guardian
A contract-review workflow that checks agreements for risks, links important findings to relevant laws, and produces a written review. It covers common agreements such as sales, leases, loans, services, contracting, and intellectual property.
法律周报
A legal-news briefing workflow that finds recent court and legal-practice articles, scores them against selected criteria, and archives chosen items in a local Obsidian notes folder. Obsidian is a local note-taking application.
legal-research
A Chinese-language legal research workflow for finding laws, regulations, court cases, compensation standards, and legal grounds.
legal-citation-comprehensive
A Chinese and foreign legal-citation tool for checking, completing, explaining, and formatting footnotes under the second edition of a legal citation manual. It handles laws, cases, legal documents, and academic sources when the relevant source material is provided.