Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jonashertner/opencaselaw --skill evidence-bundlegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jonashertner/opencaselawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jonashertner/opencaselaw/evidence-bundle)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jonashertner/opencaselaw/evidence-bundle"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jonashertner/opencaselaw/evidence-bundle/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jonashertner/opencaselaw/evidence-bundle"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jonashertner/opencaselaw/evidence-bundle.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00372 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00149 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
evidence-bundle scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Evidence bundles with ocl
Use when a deliverable relies on decisions or statutes and someone will review it later (a memo, a brief, an answer with legal authorities).
- Collect:
ocl bundle create '<query>' --max-results <n> --passage <e-number> --law <ABBR:ART> --out <folder>saves every served response (JSON and plain text), a plain-languageINDEX.mdandmanifest.jsonwith requests, timestamps, source links and SHA-256 hashes.--court,--language,--date-from/--date-tonarrow the selection; cantonal statutes take--law ZH/GOG:1. - Add decisions found elsewhere:
ocl bundle add <folder> <decision_id> ... --passage <n>. - Verify before handing over:
ocl bundle verify <folder>(exit 0 only when every listed file is intact). Compare two runs of the same question:ocl bundle diff <old> <new>. - Report the bundle path,
completeness(anunavailableitem is one the service does not have; afailedone is retried with--resume), and thecorpus_snapshot.db_generationthe answers came from.
Rules: the bundle is what was served, not an assessment of legal support;
never edit files inside it; cite from INDEX.md's labels, which are the
service's citation strings.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 27 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 5fabf1156c51
evidence-bundle is a skill published in the GitHub repository jonashertner/opencaselaw (75 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 372 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other skills, from other repositories
legaltech-expert
Expert in legal technology: contract lifecycle management, e-discovery, AI-assisted legal research, case and matter management, document automation, and compliance tooling. Use when the user mentions legal case or matter management, e-discovery and legal holds, CLM or contract review and obligation tracking, legal…
legalize-kr
Retrieve Korean laws, court precedents, administrative rules, and local ordinances through connected Legalize-KR MCP tools. Use it for document search, full text, article lookup, and revision comparison. It also guides CLI, local MCP, Git, and direct GitHub access when connected tools are unavailable.
format-monitoring-report
A formatting guide for turning already-approved legal-monitoring content into a DOCX or PDF report. It specifies a seven-section layout, blue labels, Times New Roman, footnotes, page numbers, and a final comparison table.
verifiable-legal-document
A Russian-language workflow for producing legal documents with claim identifiers, linked supporting passages, hashes, and validation reports.
matter-intake
A setup process for a new legal matter or research assignment. It turns an unstructured request into a defined question, scope, data classification, plan, sources, deadline, and completion criteria.
ukrainian-legal-research
A research workflow for determining which Ukrainian laws and regulations applied on a specific date. It checks official wording, versions, effective dates, transitional rules, legal hierarchy, authority, and official sources.