inquire

inquire is a skill for Claude Code from jongwony/epistemic-protocols. It costs 38 tokens per session (6,891 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A method for finding missing context before carrying out a task. It checks what is known, verifies what can be checked in the project, and asks focused questions about the remaining uncertainty.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before tasks where requirements, facts, or priorities are unclear. It helps gather evidence, identify unresolved decisions, and ask the most useful questions first.
Why use it?
It reduces the risk of acting on incorrect assumptions or conflicting information. It separates questions that can be answered from the code from those that need your input.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the aitesis plugin — 1 skill shipped together

Good fit Use it before tasks where requirements, facts, or priorities are unclear. It helps gather evidence, identify unresolved decisions, and ask the most useful questions first.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jongwony/epistemic-protocols/inquire
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add jongwony/epistemic-protocols --skill inquire
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jongwony/epistemic-protocols

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install aitesis, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for inquire

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jongwony/epistemic-protocols/inquire.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jongwony/epistemic-protocols/inquire)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jongwony/epistemic-protocols/inquire"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jongwony/epistemic-protocols/inquire.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 38 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 6,891 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • high Data Exfiltration · line 173
    Code or instructions that leak agent conversation context to external services, potentially exposing sensitive user interactions.
    Fix: Remove any code that sends prompts, responses, or session data externally. Preserve user privacy; never exfiltrate conversation content.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00038 $0.06891
Opus 5 $0.00019 $0.03445
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.01378
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00689

Measured yesterday against content hash b4a0d5cff646, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

inquire scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

aitesis/skills/inquire/SKILL.md · 269 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 269 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Aitesis Protocol

Infer context insufficiency before execution through AI-guided inquiry. Type: (ContextInsufficient, AI, INQUIRE, Prospect) → InformedExecution.

Definition

Aitesis (αἴτησις): A dialogical act of proactively inferring context sufficiency before execution, where AI identifies uncertainties across multiple dimensions (factual, coherence, relevance), collects contextual evidence via codebase exploration, classifies each uncertainty by dimension and verifiability, resolves memory-internal contradictions through evidence, records cross-domain concerns as outside its own resolution scope, and inquires about remaining uncertainties through information-gain prioritized mini-choices for user resolution.

── FLOW ──
Aitesis(X) → Scan(X, dimensions) → Uᵢ →
  [if Uᵢ = ∅] sufficiency_relay(reasoning) → proceed (trivial InformedExecution)
  Ctx(Uᵢ) → (Uᵢ', Uᵣ) →
  classify(Uᵢ', dimension) → [if off-diagonal] Qc → (Uᵣ'_candidates, Uₑ_candidates, Uᵢ'', Uₙ) →
  ReadOnlyVerify(Uᵣ'_candidates) → (Uᵣ' resolved | admissibility-fail → reclassify EmpiricallyObservable) →
  [if Uₑ_candidates ≠ ∅] EmpiricalObservation(Uₑ_candidates) → Uₑ →
  Q(classify_result + Uₑ + Uᵢ'', priority) → A → X' → (loop until informed)
-- Uᵣ' (Step 3 survivors = read_only_resolved): skip Phase 2; ReadOnlyVerify failures rejoin Uₑ_candidates via backward arc (detail in PHASE TRANSITIONS)
-- Uₙ (non-actionable: CrossDomain coherence + detect-only dimensions): shown in classify summary as out-of-scope
-- Uᵢ'' (factual/user-dependent or coherence/MemoryInternal/user-dependent): Phase 2 question candidates

── MORPHISM ──
Prospect
  → scan(prospect, context, dimensions)  -- infer context insufficiency (multi-dimension)
  → collect(uncertainties, codebase)     -- enrich via evidence collection
  → classify(enrichable, dimension)      -- epistemic classification (core act)
  → reclassify(MemoryInternal → Factual)  -- Coherence/MemoryInternal enters Factual resolution path
  → observe(empirically_observable, environment) -- dynamic evidence gathering (factual only)
  → surface(classify_result + observed + remaining, as_inquiry)
  → integrate(answer, prospect)
  → InformedExecution
requires: uncertain(sufficiency(X))      -- runtime checkpoint (Phase 0)
deficit:  ContextInsufficient            -- activation precondition (Layer 1/2)
preserves: task_identity(X)              -- task intent invariant; prospect context mutated (X → X')
invariant: Evidence over Inference over Detection

── TYPES ──
X        = Prospect for action (source-agnostic: task execution, analysis, investigation, or any purposeful action requiring context)
             -- Input type: morphism processes X uniformly; enumeration scopes the definition, not behavioral dispatch
Scan     = Context sufficiency scan: X → Set(Uncertainty)
Uncertainty = { domain: String, description: String, context: Set(Evidence) }
Evidence = { source: String, content: String }                -- collected during Ctx
Priority ∈ {Critical, Significant, Marginal}
Uᵢ       = Identified uncertainties from Scan(X)
Ctx      = Context collection: Uᵢ → (Uᵢ', Uᵣ)
Uᵢ'      = Enriched uncertainties (evidence added, not resolved)
Uᵣ       = Context-resolved uncertainties (resolved during collection)
Q        = Inquiry (Constitution interaction), ordered by information gain
A        = User answer ∈ {Provide(context), Point(location), Dismiss, Unknown(Partial)}
             Partial      = what the user does say they know
             -- Unknown(Partial) = user declines certainty; Phase 3 auto-promotes via Cite-or-observe tiebreaker (UserTacit → next-preferred
             -- untried EvidenceSource in ValidSources(v)) and re-enters Phase 1 for reclassification; both arcs formalized in PHASE TRANSITIONS
Ac         = User coherence classification ∈ CoherenceType     -- Phase 1 Qc gate answer type
X'       = Updated prospect (context-enriched)
InformedExecution = X' where remaining = ∅
spent(u)        = A(u) = Unknown(Partial) ∧ no valid source for u is untried     -- promotion has no target (Phase 3, T2 exhausted)
contradiction(u) = classify(u) = (Coherence, MemoryInternal) ∧ (the utterance contradicts itself ∨ the utterance contradicts collected context) ∧ no evidence can settle it
                 -- reaches Phase 2 through the Factual resolution path MemoryInternal items enter, with every source there tried;
                 -- the conflict is one of intent, not of fact: no EvidenceSource resolves it (CrossDomain items are out of scope and never reach here)
exhausted(K)    = (∀ u ∈ K: spent(u)) ∨ (∃ u ∈ K: contradiction(u))            -- K = the Phase 2 cluster; the frame itself is unanswerable, or the intent is split
                 -- one spent item is a fact the user lacks; a whole cluster spent is this protocol's boundary: what remains is not context a source can supply
-- Layer 1 (epistemic)
Dimension    ∈ {Factual, Coherence, Relevance} ∪ Emergent(Dimension)
               -- open set; external human communication excluded
-- Layer 2 (tool implementation, Factual and Coherence/MemoryInternal fibers — fibration structure)
Verifiability  ∈ {ReadOnlyVerifiable, EmpiricallyObservable, UserDependent}
EvidenceSource ∈ {UserTacit, Instrumentation, CodeDerivable, CanonicalExternal}
                 ∪ Emergent(EvidenceSource)
               -- open set symmetric with Dimension; Emergent accumulator for novel channels
               -- (TestSuite, AsyncComms, HypomnesisIndex, RuntimeObservability, etc.)
               -- Emergent base promotion under variation-stable observed use
Claim(u)       = { referent: String, scope: String, expected_source_kind: EvidenceSource }
               -- expected_source_kind names the evidence CHANNEL a claim requires (which source-kind), a distinct axis from a claim's semantic category
EvidenceRef(e) = { source: String, source_kind: EvidenceSource, referent: String, scope: String, observed_at: String, content: String }
               -- interpretive extraction over Evidence (base type {source, content}): source_kind/referent/scope are inferred from content, NOT deterministic normalization
               -- this extraction exercises epistemic authority — a mis-extraction surfaces at the Phase 2 classify summary (support_integrity:unverified), not treated as deterministic relay
provenance_coupled(u, e) =
  referent(EvidenceRef(e)) = referent(Claim(u))
  ∧ authorizes(source_kind(EvidenceRef(e)), expected_source_kind(Claim(u)))   -- grantor = evidence's source_kind; claim side = expected_source_kind
authorizes : EvidenceSource × EvidenceSource → Bool   -- self-contained (no shared cross-protocol relation)
  authorizes(s, expected) ≡ s = expected
               -- reflexive base: a source-kind authorizes a claim expecting that same kind.
               -- cross-kind authorization (one kind standing in for another) is NOT granted here → defaults to non-authorizing; a richer policy
               --   matrix is a documented future extension, deliberately deferred to stay minimal-structural (deferral, not a silent gap).
scope_subsumes : String × String → Bool   -- path/tag-prefix subsumption: broader scope contains narrower (reused by coverage below)
ValidSources : Verifiability → ℘(EvidenceSource)
  ValidSources(ReadOnlyVerifiable)    = {CodeDerivable, UserTacit, CanonicalExternal} ∪ Emergent(EvidenceSource)
  ValidSources(EmpiricallyObservable) = {Instrumentation, UserTacit}                  ∪ Emergent(EvidenceSource)
  ValidSources(UserDependent)         = {UserTacit}                                    ∪ Emergent(EvidenceSource)
  -- Emergent(EvidenceSource) fallback-admissible when no base element fits the observed channel
  -- cost-ordering tiebreaker (ascending): CodeDerivable < CanonicalExternal < Instrumentation < UserTacit
  -- default selects lowest-cost valid source; override requires cite per Cite-or-observe rule
CoherenceType ∈ {MemoryInternal, CrossDomain}
               -- 2D: Scope(Same/Cross) × Resolution(Evidence/Structure); off-diagonal → Gate
Scope      ∈ {Same, Cross}
Resolution ∈ {Evidence, Structure}
off_diagonal(s, r) = ¬((s = Same ∧ r = Evidence) ∨ (s = Cross ∧ r = Structure))
classify   = Uᵢ' → Σ(d: Dimension). Fiber(d)
             where Fiber(Factual)       = Σ(v: Verifiability). {s: EvidenceSource | s ∈ ValidSources(v)}
                   Fiber(Coherence)     = CoherenceType
                   Fiber(Relevance)     = Unit    -- detect only
                   Fiber(Emergent(_))   = Unit    -- detect only (default; refinable per discovered dimension)
             -- 2-layer model = Grothendieck fibration: Layer 2 exists over Factual fiber;
             --   Factual fiber is itself a dependent sum — pair (v, s) where s is a SINGLE chosen element of ValidSources(v)
             --   (subset type {s | s ∈ ValidSources(v)}, not the power-set element itself)
             --   EvidenceSource choice within ValidSources(v) routes resolution channel
             -- Coherence fiber classifies into CoherenceType, where MemoryInternal instances enter the Factual resolution path
             --   (and inherit EvidenceSource via Factual reclassification)
             -- CrossDomain/Relevance/Emergent → detect + show as out-of-scope in classify summary (no EvidenceSource tag)
             -- ReadOnlyVerifiable direct-resolve admissibility = admissible(u): ONE witness e carrying both axes defined below, enforced at Step₃ (ReadOnlyAdmissible);
             --   the T4 arc fires on ¬admissible(u) and names the axis the witnesses failed on — coverage_gap(u) = ¬∃ e: coverage(u, e);
             --   support_integrity_unverified(u) = ¬∃ e: support_integrity(u, e); when each axis has a witness but no single e carries both, both labels are surfaced
coverage(u, e)          ≡ scope_subsumes(scope(EvidenceRef(e)), scope(Claim(u)))    -- rebutting axis: does THIS evidence cover the whole claim?
support_integrity(u, e) ≡ provenance_coupled(u, e) ∧ evidence_behavior_linked(u, e)    -- undercutting axis: does THIS evidence's source-kind/referent authorize the claim, and does its link to behavior hold?
admissible(u)           ≡ ∃ e ∈ context(u): coverage(u, e) ∧ support_integrity(u, e)
               -- the two axes are judged on the same witness: a broad-scope but unrelated e and a well-sourced but narrow e do not combine into admissibility
               -- context(u) = evidence accessor over base Uncertainty.context: Set(Evidence) (existing field, not new)
               -- evidence_behavior_linked(u, e): e's evidence→behavior link verified (breaks-on-change), not silently desynced; currency ⊂ this (temporal sub-case)
               -- (rebutting/undercutting framing per Pollock: two kinds of defeater — not asserted exhaustive)
ReadOnlyAdmissible = { u : ReadOnlyVerifiable | admissible(u) }
                   -- Step₃ ReadOnlyVerify takes the ReadOnlyVerifiable-classified candidate set (Uᵣ'_candidates, incl. support_integrity-undetermined items) and enforces this predicate at resolution time; ReadOnlyAdmissible characterizes the resolution survivors (= Uᵣ'), NOT a Step-3 input pre-filter.
ObservationSpec = { setup: Action, execute: Action, observe: Predicate, cleanup: Action }
EmpiricalObservation = (Uₑ_candidates, ObservationSpec) → Uₑ  -- dynamic evidence gathering
Uᵣ'_candidates = { u ∈ Uᵢ' : classify(u) = (Factual, (ReadOnlyVerifiable, s)) ∧ s ≠ UserTacit ∧ s ∉ Emergent(EvidenceSource) }  -- Step 2 output → Step 3 input
               -- includes support_integrity-undetermined items pending resolution-time enforcement; symmetric with Uₑ_candidates (transient set, NOT a MODE STATE partition bucket)
               -- Step 3 partitions this set: survivors → Uᵣ' (read_only_resolved); admissibility failures → backward arc → EmpiricallyObservable
Uᵣ'        = Read-only verified uncertainties    -- Step 3 survivors only (= ReadOnlyAdmissible) → read_only_resolved; resolved (no Phase 2); excludes items routed via UserTacit override per Cite-or-observe rule
Uₑ_candidates = { u ∈ Uᵢ' : classify(u) = (Factual, (EmpiricallyObservable, s)) ∧ s ≠ UserTacit ∧ s ∉ Emergent(EvidenceSource) }
              -- Phase 1 observation checkpoint; excludes Cite-or-observe cite-based UserTacit overrides (those route directly to Uᵢ'')
Uₑ         = Empirically observed uncertainties    -- evidence attached, proceeds to Phase 2
             -- evidence is positive (a differentiating result) or negative (a null signal, or an observation that ran
             --   without resolving within its execution budget). A budget overrun encountered DURING execution is an
             --   observation outcome landing here — not an escape; escapes are pre-observation only (see EscapeCondition)
Uᵢ''       = Remaining user-dependent uncertainties
             -- Includes: (a) Factual/UserDependent items
             --           (b) Factual/EmpiricallyObservable with EvidenceSource = UserTacit (Cite-or-observe cited override)
             --           (c) Factual/ReadOnlyVerifiable with EvidenceSource = UserTacit (Cite-or-observe cited override)
             --           (d) reclassified Coherence/MemoryInternal landing in any of (a)-(c) above
             --           (e) any Factual(v) with s ∈ Emergent(EvidenceSource) (channel unvalidated by definition; awaits Phase 2 Qs_emergent_channel confirmation)
             -- Phase 2 question candidates
Uₙ         = Non-actionable detected uncertainties  -- Fiber(Coherence) = CrossDomain or Fiber(d) = Unit; shown in classify summary as out-of-scope
Action     = capability call sequence (artifact write, environment run)
EscapeCondition ∈ {EnvironmentMutation, RiskElevated}
                    -- maps to Cite-or-observe escape hatches; logged in observation_skips
                    -- pre-observation judgments only: each names a reason the observation MUST NOT run at all.
                    --   Duration is not such a reason and is not a member: running and hitting the budget yields
                    --   evidence (the budget-exhausted outcome in Step 4), while declining to run yields none

── PHASE TRANSITIONS ──
Phase 0: X → Scan(X, dimensions) → Uᵢ?                        -- context sufficiency checkpoint (silent)
       [Uᵢ = ∅] sufficiency_relay(reasoning) → proceed          -- zero-signal: present the sufficiency finding as relay text; trivial InformedExecution (remaining = ∅), Aitesis not activated
Phase 1: Uᵢ → Step₁ Ctx(Uᵢ) → (Uᵢ', Uᵣ) →                    -- Step 1: context collection [Tool]
         Step₂ classify(Uᵢ', dimension) → (Uᵣ'_candidates, Uₑ_candidates, Uᵢ'', Uₙ) → -- Step 2: epistemic classification (core act); Uₙ = non-actionable [Tool]
         [if off_diagonal(scope_assessment, resolution_assessment)] Qc(scope_assessment, resolution_assessment) → Stop → Ac  -- Coherence 2D Constitution interaction [Tool]
         -- evaluation order: Qc resolves before Uₑ_candidates computation; reclassified MemoryInternal/EmpiricallyObservable enters Uₑ_candidates
         Step₃ ReadOnlyVerify(Uᵣ'_candidates) →     -- Step 3: read-only verification (CodeDerivable + CanonicalExternal); enforces admissible(u) (one witness for both axes) at resolution time over the candidate set (incl. support_integrity-undetermined items) — survivors = ReadOnlyAdmissible = Uᵣ' (resolve directly, read_only_resolved); failures take the backward arc below [Tool]
           [if ¬admissible(u)] reclassify(u, EmpiricallyObservable) → goto Step₂  -- backward arc (T4): support-integrity/coverage failure re-enters classification (staleness = temporal sub-case of support_integrity_unverified)
         [if Uₑ_candidates ≠ ∅] Step₄ EmpiricalObservation(Uₑ_candidates) → Uₑ  -- Step 4: dynamic evidence gathering [Tool]
Phase 2: Qs(classify_result + Uₑ + Uᵢ''[cluster], framing) → Stop → A          -- uncertainty surfacing [Tool]; cluster = one coherent cluster (size ≤ 4)
         [if exhausted(cluster)] Qs names the boundary beside the cluster       -- the spent items with the channels each tried, or the contradiction quoted; disposition stays the user's through sufficiency or Dismiss below
Phase 3: A → integrate(A, X) → X'                               -- prospect update (track: mutates Λ.X)
         [if A = Unknown(Partial) ∧ some valid source for u is untried] auto_promote(u, next-preferred untried source in ValidSources(v)) → goto Phase 1  -- backward arc (T2): a tried source is not re-selected
         [if A = Unknown(Partial) ∧ no valid source for u is untried] u stays in Λ.remaining → Phase 2  -- promotion has no target; disposition is the user's, not an AI dismissal

── LOOP ──
After Phase 3: re-scan X' for remaining or newly emerged uncertainties.
New uncertainties accumulate into uncertainties (cumulative, never replace).
If Uᵢ ≠ ∅: return to Phase 1 (collect context for new uncertainties).
If remaining = ∅: proceed with execution.
User can declare the context sufficient at Phase 2 (sufficiency_declared): the remaining uncertainties are dismissed with the declaration recorded and the loop converges.
At exhausted(cluster) the declaration or a Dismiss is the disposition left: the convergence trace records each such item as exhausted with the boundary named — the channels tried, or the contradiction quoted — so what inquiry could not supply is readable in the residual. This protocol ends there; what lies past its boundary is another deficit, read from that residual by whatever routes the turn after.
Continue until: informed(X').
Convergence evidence: At remaining = ∅, present transformation trace — for each u ∈ (Λ.context_resolved ∪ Λ.read_only_resolved ∪ Λ.empirically_observed ∪ Λ.user_responded), show (ContextInsufficient(u) → resolution(u)). Convergence is demonstrated, not asserted. The trace additionally declares every u ∈ Λ.non_factual_detected as detected-but-outside-scope: these resolve nowhere, so no transformation pair exists for them. The declaration is unconditional and does not gate — the all-non-actionable path (actionable(Λ) = ∅) converges without reaching a Phase 2 question, so this trace is the only surface carrying the detections there.

── CONVERGENCE ──
actionable(Λ) = uncertainties \ non_factual_detected       -- Fiber(Factual) + Fiber(Coherence)=MemoryInternal uncertainties
informed(X') = remaining = ∅                                -- non_factual_detected does not block convergence
sufficiency_declared = the user's Phase 2 free response declaring the context sufficient   -- consumed by LOOP

── TOOL GROUNDING ──
-- Realization: Constitution → TextPresent+Stop; Extension → TextPresent+Proceed
Phase 0 Scan    (sense)       → Internal analysis (no external tool)
Phase 0 sufficiency_relay (extension) → TextPresent+Proceed (Uᵢ = ∅: present the sufficiency finding with reasoning; proceed with X unchanged, trivial InformedExecution)
Phase 1 Ctx     (observe)     → artifact read, artifact search (stored knowledge extraction: codebase, memory, references); external fetch (conditional: CanonicalExternal channel — RFCs, vendor API docs, standards; `source: "web:{url}"` tag + staleness guard via codebase version cross-check); environment run (conditional: VersionControlHistory channel — read-only commit-log queries via subprocess (content pickaxe, message search, temporal range); `source: "history:{ref}"` tag; collection-only — ref-type staleness is classified at Step 3 as the temporal sub-case of support_integrity (T4))
Phase 1 Classify (observe)    → Internal analysis (multi-dimension assessment); artifact read, artifact search (stored knowledge cross-reference analysis)
Phase 1 Qc      (constitution)        → present (conditional: Coherence 2D off-diagonal Constitution interaction; fires only when scope ≠ resolution assessment; user classifies coherence type as MemoryInternal or CrossDomain)
Phase 2 Qs_emergent_channel (constitution) → present (specialization of Phase 2 Qs: channel unvalidated by definition; regardless of parent Verifiability, the classify summary records the observed channel description and awaits user confirmation before proceeding; confirmation rides the parent A coproduct — Point(location) designates/validates the authoritative channel, Provide(context) supersedes it, Dismiss declines it (proceed-with-assumption), Unknown(Partial) leaves the item unresolved — no answer auto-resolves the item through the unconfirmed channel; the answer is recorded in Λ.channel_validations — a channel already Point-validated this session skips this gate only (prior in-session user decision); each later item on that channel still takes the claim-specific Phase 1 evidence pass against the validated channel, per the Point(location) semantics (record location, resolve via next Phase 1 iteration) — never blanket-resolved as user-responded)
Phase 2 Qs_staleness (constitution) → present (specialization of Phase 2 Qs: when staleness cannot be verified; require BOTH `staleness:unverified` tag — the temporal sub-case of the general `support_integrity:unverified` tag — AND classify summary surfacing — no silent escalation path; publishing authority claim warrants user awareness)
Phase 1 Observe (transform)   → artifact write, environment run, artifact read (dynamic evidence gathering, Factual only); cleanup via environment run
Phase 2 Qs      (constitution)        → present (mandatory: classify result + uncertainty surfacing; user provides context judgment on insufficiency; an item whose promotion is spent is marked as such in the classify summary, so its reach is recognized rather than recalled)
Phase 3         (track)       → Internal state update
converge     (extension)       → TextPresent+Proceed (convergence evidence trace, including the out-of-scope declaration for every Λ.non_factual_detected item; proceed with informed execution)
sufficiency  (extension)       → TextPresent+Proceed (fires on sufficiency_declared: the user declares the context sufficient as a free response at any Phase 2. Every uncertainty still in Λ.remaining moves to Λ.dismissed carrying the declaration as its recorded reason, so remaining = ∅ and informed(X') holds — the run converges as InformedExecution, not as an exit. It is a free-response pathway rather than a peer option in the Phase 2 set because declaring the WHOLE inquiry sufficient produces no trajectory on the per-item axis those options occupy: it disposes of the axis instead of taking a position on it. Present the dismissed set with the declaration recorded against each, so the convergence trace shows what was accepted unresolved rather than asserting resolution)
exhausted    (extension)       → TextPresent+Proceed (fires at Phase 2 when exhausted(cluster) holds: every item in the cluster is promotion-spent, or a coherence item is a contradiction no evidence settles. Relay: the boundary is named beside the cluster — the spent items and the channels each tried, or the contradiction quoted from the utterance — so the user disposes of the cluster knowing that another round of inquiry yields nothing. The option set is unchanged: disposition stays the user's through sufficiency or Dismiss, and the residual carries the boundary into the convergence trace. This protocol ends at that boundary; what the residual shows next is read by whatever routes the turn after, from the trace, without a pointer from here)
seam         (extension)       → TextPresent+Proceed (fires at deactivation/handoff: a user-declared chain naming the next protocol settles the next move; proceed directly to it, citing that settling source; every Constitution gate inside this protocol and inside the next protocol fires unchanged)

── MODE STATE ──
Λ = { phase: Phase, X: Prospect, uncertainties: Set(Uncertainty),
      classify_results: Map(Uncertainty, Σ(d: Dimension). Fiber(d)), -- fibration-typed classification
      context_resolved: Set(Uncertainty),  -- Uᵣ from TYPES
      read_only_resolved: Set(Uncertainty), -- Uᵣ' from TYPES
      empirically_observed: Set(Uncertainty), -- Uₑ from TYPES
      non_factual_detected: Set(Uncertainty), -- Uₙ from TYPES; Fiber(Coherence) = CrossDomain or Fiber(d) = Unit, classify summary display
      user_responded: Set(Uncertainty),
      remaining: Set(Uncertainty), dismissed: Set(Uncertainty),
      history: List<(Uncertainty, A)>, observation_history: List<(ObservationSpec, Evidence)>,
      observation_skips: List<(Uncertainty, EscapeCondition, String)>,  -- audit trail for Cite-or-observe escape hatches (pre-observation only — an observation that ran and overran its budget is recorded in observation_history, never here)
      source_choice_overrides: List<(Uncertainty, EvidenceSource, String)>,  -- audit trail for Cite-or-observe cite-based UserTacit overrides
      channel_validations: List<(Uncertainty, EvidenceSource, A)>,  -- Qs_emergent_channel answers recorded at Phase 3; audit trail feeds variation-stable observed use for (cross-session) base promotion; a channel Point-validated this session does not re-enter the gate this session
      active: Bool,
      cause_tag: String }
-- Invariant: uncertainties = context_resolved ∪ read_only_resolved ∪ empirically_observed ∪ non_factual_detected ∪ user_responded ∪ remaining ∪ dismissed (pairwise disjoint)
-- Note: observation_skips and source_choice_overrides are audit logs orthogonal to the partition —
--       observation_skips: logged when EmpiricallyObservable is reclassified to UserDependent via Cite-or-observe escape conditions
--                          (pre-observation only — the observation never ran; an observation that ran without resolving
--                           within its budget lands in Uₑ as negative evidence and is recorded in observation_history)
--       source_choice_overrides: logged when UserTacit is selected over cheaper EvidenceSource with cited dominance basis (Cite-or-observe dominance); audit trail supports variation-stable observed use for cost-ordering

── COMPOSITION ──
*: product — (D₁ × D₂) → (R₁ × R₂). Dimension resolution emergent via session context.

Read the full file on GitHub · 269 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday Changed · +10 lines b4a0d5cff646
  2. 4d ago Changed · -15 lines 6884014a0258
  3. 8d ago First seen · 274 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 01d784dc5b45

Subscribe to this mod's changes

inquire is a skill published in the GitHub repository jongwony/epistemic-protocols (160 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 6,891 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.