agentmods.dev

code_review

code_review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Jorgejie/ai_scaffold. It costs 7 tokens per session (1,136 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code review checklist that organizes findings into fatal problems, warnings, and suggestions. Code review is the process of checking code for defects, risks, and improvements before it is accepted.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review code against required checks and produce findings grouped by severity, including platform-specific checks when applicable.
Why use it?
It gives reviews a consistent structure and helps separate issues that must block a change from those that are advisory.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

not rated 57repo 3mo ago A scan SkillSpector: pass 7 tokens original MIT

Good fit Use it to review code against required checks and produce findings grouped by severity, including platform-specific checks when applicable.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jorgejie/ai_scaffold/code_review
View source ↗ Jorgejie/ai_scaffold
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Jorgejie/ai_scaffold --skill code_review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jorgejie/ai_scaffold

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code_review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jorgejie/ai_scaffold/code_review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jorgejie/ai_scaffold/code_review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jorgejie/ai_scaffold/code_review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jorgejie/ai_scaffold/code_review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code_review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jorgejie/ai_scaffold/code_review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jorgejie/ai_scaffold/code_review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 7 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,136 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00007 $0.01136
Opus 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00454
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00001 $0.00227
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00114

Measured 2mo ago against content hash da77632abdaa, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code_review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

cli/templates/skills/code_review/SKILL.md · 118 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 118 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

{{t "code_review.title"}}

{{t "code_review.trigger_title"}}

  1. {{t "code_review.trigger_1"}}
  2. {{t "code_review.trigger_2"}}
  3. {{t "code_review.trigger_3"}}
  4. {{t "code_review.trigger_4"}}

{{t "code_review.skip"}}

1 {{t "code_review.checklist_title"}}

1.1 {{t "code_review.fatal_title"}}

# Check Method
1 {{t "code_review.fatal_row1"}}
2 {{t "code_review.fatal_row2"}}
3 {{t "code_review.fatal_row3"}}
4 {{t "code_review.fatal_row4"}}
5 {{t "code_review.fatal_row5"}}
6 {{t "code_review.fatal_row6"}}
{{PLATFORM_FATAL_CHECKS}}
{{#if HAS_NDK}}
F-NDK1 {{t "code_review.fatal_ndk1"}}
F-NDK2 {{t "code_review.fatal_ndk2"}}
F-NDK3 {{t "code_review.fatal_ndk3"}}
F-NDK4 {{t "code_review.fatal_ndk4"}}
F-NDK5 {{t "code_review.fatal_ndk5"}}
F-NDK6 {{t "code_review.fatal_ndk6"}}
{{/if}}

1.2 {{t "code_review.warning_title"}}

# Check Method
7 {{t "code_review.warning_row7"}}
8 {{t "code_review.warning_row8"}}
9 {{t "code_review.warning_row9"}}
10 {{t "code_review.warning_row10"}}
{{PLATFORM_WARNING_CHECKS}}
{{#if HAS_NDK}}
W-NDK1 {{t "code_review.warning_ndk1"}}
W-NDK2 {{t "code_review.warning_ndk2"}}
W-NDK3 {{t "code_review.warning_ndk3"}}
W-NDK4 {{t "code_review.warning_ndk4"}}
W-NDK5 {{t "code_review.warning_ndk5"}}
{{/if}}

1.3 {{t "code_review.suggestion_title"}}

# Check Method
11 {{t "code_review.suggestion_row11"}}
12 {{t "code_review.suggestion_row12"}}
13 {{t "code_review.suggestion_row13"}}
14 {{t "code_review.suggestion_row14"}}
{{PLATFORM_SUGGESTION_CHECKS}}
{{#if HAS_NDK}}
S-NDK1 {{t "code_review.suggestion_ndk1"}}
S-NDK2 {{t "code_review.suggestion_ndk2"}}
S-NDK3 {{t "code_review.suggestion_ndk3"}}
S-NDK4 {{t "code_review.suggestion_ndk4"}}
S-NDK5 {{t "code_review.suggestion_ndk5"}}
{{/if}}

Read the full file on GitHub · 118 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 118 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A da77632abdaa

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code_review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jorgejie/ai_scaffold (57 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 1,136 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Code review
Related

code_review compared with skills from other repositories

code_review next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
code_reviewJorgejie/ai_scaffoldSkill573mo agoMITA7Claude Code, Codex
autoreviewopenclaw/clawhubSkill9.5ktodayMITA17Claude Code, Codex
agent-teams-simplify-and-hardenLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skillsSkill2.2k3d agoMITA115Claude Code, Codex
omh-code-reviewrlaope/oh-my-hermesSkill5.3ktodayMITA49Claude Code, Codex
revdiff-planumputun/revdiffSkill949todayMITA84Claude Code
explore-unknownsdzhng/skillsSkill1.5kyesterdayMITA162Claude Code, Codex
re0-mergeLilMGenius/paperthinSkill1.4ktodayMITA51Claude Code, Codex