Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add joris887/exosuit --skill fix-issuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/joris887/exosuitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/joris887/exosuit/fix-issue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/joris887/exosuit/fix-issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/joris887/exosuit/fix-issue/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/joris887/exosuit/fix-issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/joris887/exosuit/fix-issue.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00770 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00308 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00154 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
fix-issue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
fix-issue
Fix GitHub issue $ARGUMENTS following project coding standards.
1. Get Issue Details
gh issue view $ARGUMENTS
2. Understand the Problem
- Read the issue description carefully
- Check for related issues or PRs
- Identify acceptance criteria
3. Create Feature Branch
Detect the default branch dynamically:
DEFAULT_BRANCH=$(grep -oP '^\- \*\*Default branch:\*\* \K\S+' CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null)
if [ -z "$DEFAULT_BRANCH" ]; then
DEFAULT_BRANCH=$(git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's@^refs/remotes/origin/@@')
fi
if [ -z "$DEFAULT_BRANCH" ]; then
for branch in main master develop; do
if git show-ref --verify --quiet "refs/heads/$branch"; then DEFAULT_BRANCH="$branch"; break; fi
done
fi
git checkout $DEFAULT_BRANCH
git pull origin $DEFAULT_BRANCH
git checkout -b fix/issue-$ARGUMENTS
Note: This skill is a standalone quick-fix flow (issue → branch → TDD fix → PR). For fixes that are part of an active sprint, use /story-cycle instead — it integrates with the sprint branch and quality gates.
4. Search for Relevant Code
- Use Glob and Grep to find related files
- Understand the current implementation
- Identify what needs to change
- Check
docs/adr/for accepted decisions that constrain the fix approach — the fix must respect existing architectural decisions
5. Implement Fix (TDD)
- Write a failing test that reproduces the issue
- Verify the test fails for the right reason
- Implement the minimal fix
- Verify the test passes
- Run full test suite (use project's test command from CLAUDE.md)
6. Verify Fix
- Ensure code passes linting and type checking
- Review changes for quality
7. Commit and Push
git add .
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
fix: resolve issue #$ARGUMENTS
[Description of what was fixed and how]
Closes #$ARGUMENTS
Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
EOF
)"
git push -u origin fix/issue-$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 115 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 997e58c97687
fix-issue is a skill published in the GitHub repository joris887/exosuit (8 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 770 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
linked-intent-dev
Guide for linked-intent development (LID). Consult for ALL code changes. Walks changes through a mode-aware six-phase workflow (HLD → LLD → EARS → intent-narrowing edge audit → tests-first → code) with mandatory stops between each phase. Bugs walk the arrow like any other change — no short-circuit. Enforces cascade…
plan-pipeline-execute
Execute a validated plan: worktree isolation, TDD scaffolding, level-based parallel agents, quality gate with smoke test, PR creation and merge. Handles everything through to merged PR.
qa
Systematic QA testing of a web application: diff-aware, tiered, with fix-and-verify loop.
refactor
Safely restructures existing code while preserving behavior through impact analysis and TDD. User-invoked entry point via /refactor; not for autonomous or subagent use.
bugfix
Fixes bugs of any size from hotfixes to complex debugging sessions using root cause diagnosis and TDD. User-invoked entry point via /bugfix; not for autonomous or subagent use.
software-health
Assess and maintain software health through scoped change or module reviews, workflow consistency, failure recovery, resource lifetime, performance, and AI instruction/tool contracts when applicable. Use for systematic application-health reviews, contradictory or sluggish behavior across components, and regression…