Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/joshukraine/dotfiles/debriefnpx skills add joshukraine/dotfiles --skill debriefgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/joshukraine/dotfilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/joshukraine/dotfiles/debrief)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/joshukraine/dotfiles/debrief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/joshukraine/dotfiles/debrief.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00020 | $0.02278 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01139 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00456 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00228 |
Grade A, and why
debrief scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Debrief
You are a senior developer presenting your recent work to a technically savvy executive who cares deeply about code quality, architecture decisions, and understanding the codebase. This is not a documentation dump — it's a guided walkthrough, the kind you'd give sitting side by side at a computer.
Not the same as:
/checkpoint— a quick 2-minute status orientation; this is the deep sit-down walkthrough./dustoff— re-derives a dormant project's whole state; this walks the most recent chunk of work.
Context
Read docs/prd/ROADMAP.md and the project's CLAUDE.md to orient yourself, then read the specific PRD document(s) in docs/prd/ relevant to the completed work. Review recent git history to identify the most recent meaningful chunk of work (typically since the last merged PR or set of PRs). Identify the project name (from the repo name, CLAUDE.md, or ROADMAP.md) — this must appear at the top of every debrief file.
When citing PRD sections, always use the format filename.md §N "Section Heading". Never use bare PRD §N references without specifying the file.
Your Task
Present a debrief covering the sections below. Be conversational and opinionated — explain not just what you built, but why you made the choices you did, what tradeoffs exist, and what you'd flag for attention.
The work below produces two files (see Section 5): a rich HTML full debrief the executive opens in a browser, and a terse Markdown summary kept as a historical log. Write the section content first, then render it into the HTML template.
1. What We Built (and Why It Matters)
- Summarize the feature(s) completed since the last debrief or major checkpoint.
- Connect the work to the relevant PRD phase/section — where are we in the bigger picture?
- Highlight any scope decisions: what was included, what was intentionally deferred, and why.
2. Architecture & Design Decisions
Walk through the key technical decisions as if explaining your reasoning to someone who will maintain this code long-term.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 160 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 76205441c2ce
debrief is a skill published in the GitHub repository joshukraine/dotfiles (422 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 2,278 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cmux-rebuild
Manage the user's durable dev sessions — zellij sessions on remote hosts (bonbon, taffy) reached over mosh, plus the local host's (trifle) own detached zellij sessions, surfaced as cmux tabs via ssh::durable / zellij::resume. Load when the user wants to rebuild/resurrect lost cmux durable surfaces after a cmux restart…
cmux-fork-session
Fork the current agent session — Claude Code or pi — into a new cmux split pane (or tab): opens a split beside the caller, relaunches this session forked (claude --fork-session / pi --fork), titles it 'fork: ', and keeps that title. Use when the user asks to fork/duplicate/branch the current session into a new split…
ml-paper-writing
Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, structuring arguments, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, reviewer guidelines, and citation verification workflows.
patch-stack-action
Manage patch-stack forks — setup, daily patch editing, and sync workflows. Use when a repo references DJRHails/patch-stack-action, has commits prefixed "patch-stack:", or has patch/ branches.
python-conventions
Python coding conventions, modern tooling, and project setup. Apply when writing or reviewing Python code, creating projects, writing scripts, or migrating from legacy tools. Covers uv, ruff, ty, type hints, code structure, async, testing, and project configuration.
review-pr
Review an existing GitHub PR — one verified single-pass read of the diff, inline P1–P3 findings, fixes for the P1/P2s pushed to the PR branch, scoped verification, resolved threads, a summary. Escalates to a two-reader second opinion only for large source changes. Use when asked to review and fix a PR, or to run the…