Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add josstei/maestro-orchestrate --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/josstei/maestro-orchestrateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00048 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00019 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00010 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00005 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Methodology loaded via MCP. Call get_skill_content(resources: ["code-review"]).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 8 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A c7b9e2c0a828
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository josstei/maestro-orchestrate (484 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 48 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-07.
Other skills, from other repositories
ruthless-refactorer
Expertise in Senior Principal Engineering refactoring. Use when you need to eliminate technical debt, remove "AI Slop," simplify complex logic, and ensure DRY code.
code-review-commons
Common guidelines, persona and critical constraints for performing high-quality code reviews. Use this skill when performing a /code-review or /pr-code-review command.
code-review
Perform thorough code review and audit of implemented features. Compares implementation against the technical plan, checks for AI-specific risks, and provides actionable feedback. Activate for: review, audit, code quality assessment, security review.
verify-change
A change-checking skill that reviews code differences and checks whether related documentation, tests, and records were updated.
find-simplifications
Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…
spec-kitty-runtime-review
Review runtime-owned outputs using the Spec Kitty review workflow surface, then direct approval or rejection with structured feedback. Triggers: "review this work package", "check runtime output", "approve this step", "review WP", "is this WP ready to approve", "check this implementation". Does NOT handle: setup-only…