Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add josstei/maestro-orchestrate --skill statusgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/josstei/maestro-orchestrateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/status)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/status"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/status/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/status"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/josstei/maestro-orchestrate/status.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00159 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00064 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00032 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
status scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Maestro Status
Call get_skill_content with resources: ["architecture"].
Workflow
- Read the active session using MCP state tools if available; otherwise fall back to scripts or direct file read
- Report session ID, creation timestamp, workflow mode, and overall status
- Show phase breakdown: completed phases with timestamps, current active phase, pending phases, and failed phases with error summaries
- Report file manifest (files created, modified, deleted), token usage by agent, and unresolved errors
Constraints
- This is read-only; do not mutate state, archive sessions, or continue execution
- If no active session exists, say so plainly
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 23 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 245849e0525d
status is a skill published in the GitHub repository josstei/maestro-orchestrate (484 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 159 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-07.
Other skills, from other repositories
spec-kitty-implement-review
Orchestrate the implement-review loop for Spec Kitty work packages using any configured agent. Covers agent dispatch, state transitions, rejection cycles, arbiter escalation, and dependency-aware sequencing across all 13 supported coding agents. Triggers: "implement and review WPs", "run the implement-review loop"…
spec-kitty-runtime-review
Review runtime-owned outputs using the Spec Kitty review workflow surface, then direct approval or rejection with structured feedback. Triggers: "review this work package", "check runtime output", "approve this step", "review WP", "is this WP ready to approve", "check this implementation". Does NOT handle: setup-only…
01-sdlc
Orchestrates a request from framing to a draft pull request, autonomous or supervised, isolating implementation, independent review, and final outcome challenge. Use when the user wants to deliver a change end to end. Not for one step.
00-async-dev
Drive the async-dev pipeline from one entry point, whether setup, run, or review. Use when the user wants to install async dev, run a ready issue, or address PR review comments, or on a webhook trigger. Not for plain status checks.
ticket-manager
Expertise in managing Linear tickets locally using Markdown files. Use when you need to create, update, search, or break down features into atomic implementation tickets.
conductor-review
Reviews a completed track against its plan and guidelines; auto-archives on pass, auto-deletes and restarts on fail.