Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to jpawlowski/hacs.integration_blueprint. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jpawlowski/hacs.integration_blueprint/main/.agents/skills/blueprint-tooling/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jpawlowski/hacs.integration_blueprintWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpawlowski/hacs.integration_blueprint/blueprint-tooling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpawlowski/hacs.integration_blueprint/blueprint-tooling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jpawlowski/hacs.integration_blueprint/blueprint-tooling/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jpawlowski/hacs.integration_blueprint/blueprint-tooling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jpawlowski/hacs.integration_blueprint/blueprint-tooling.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 8 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Privilege Escalation · line 108 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
- medium Prompt Injection · line 47 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Prompt Injection · line 49 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Prompt Injection · line 50 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Prompt Injection · line 51 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Prompt Injection · line 53 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Prompt Injection · line 52 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Prompt Injection · line 151 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00207 | $0.02761 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00103 | $0.01380 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00552 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00276 |
Grade A, and why
blueprint-tooling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 198 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Repository tooling
Rule zero: use the project scripts
Never craft your own hass, pip, pytest, ruff, or pyright invocation. The scripts activate the right virtual
environment, set PYTHONPATH, manage ports and processes, and run hooks. Agents that bypass them break in ways that
look like code bugs.
Which script to run
Pick the narrowest one that covers what you changed:
| Changed files | Run |
|---|---|
*.py only |
script/python + script/type-check |
*.yaml / *.yml only |
script/yaml-check |
*.md only |
script/markdown |
script/ or .devcontainer/*.sh only |
script/shell + script/shell-check |
| Multiple types, or unsure | script/lint + script/type-check |
| Integration metadata, translations, YAML | script/hassfest |
Fix mode vs. check mode
Fix-mode scripts auto-heal files and print what they could not fix. Their output is the complete picture — there
is no need to run the matching -check script afterwards.
# Loop until both exit 0:
script/lint # formats Python, shell, markdown; checks yaml + shellcheck; reports the rest
script/type-check # pyright — never auto-fixes, always a manual loop
| Fix mode | Check mode (read-only, for CI) |
|---|---|
script/lint |
script/lint-check |
script/python |
script/python-check |
script/shell |
script/shell-check |
script/markdown |
script/markdown-check |
script/spell |
script/spell-check |
| — | script/check (type-check + lint-check + spell-check), script/yaml-check, script/type-check, script/test |
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 198 lines · 207 tokens per session scan A e9a03f925441
blueprint-tooling is a skill published in the GitHub repository jpawlowski/hacs.integration_blueprint (49 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 207 tokens to every session and 2,761 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
homeassistant
Source-layer Home Assistant guide material preserved behind the runtime guide.
bat-story-eval
Compare MCP tool behavior between target and baseline versions using pre-built and custom stories with diff-based triage.
contrib-pr-review
Review a contribution PR for safety, quality, and readiness. Checks for security concerns, test coverage, size appropriateness, and intent alignment. Use when reviewing external contributions.
bat-adhoc
Run bot acceptance tests to validate MCP tools work correctly from a real AI agent's perspective. Use when testing PRs, detecting regressions, or verifying tool changes end-to-end with Claude/Gemini CLIs.
issue-to-pr-resolver
Implement a GitHub issue end-to-end — create a worktree branch, implement the feature with tests, create a draft PR, then iteratively resolve all CI failures and review comments until the PR is clean. Use when you need to fully implement a GitHub issue from start to merge-ready. Triggers on "implement issue", "resolve…
my-pr-checker
Manage your own GitHub pull requests — check CI status, inline review comments, PR-level comments, resolve review threads, fix issues, and iterate until all checks pass and threads are resolved. Use for managing your own PRs (not external contributions). Triggers on "check my PR", "check PR", "/my-pr-checker ".