Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jschuller/mcp-server-servicenow --skill assessing-change-impactgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jschuller/mcp-server-servicenowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jschuller/mcp-server-servicenow/assessing-change-impact)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jschuller/mcp-server-servicenow/assessing-change-impact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jschuller/mcp-server-servicenow/assessing-change-impact/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jschuller/mcp-server-servicenow/assessing-change-impact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jschuller/mcp-server-servicenow/assessing-change-impact.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00105 | $0.01659 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.00664 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00332 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00166 |
Grade A, and why
assessing-change-impact scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 90 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Assessing Change Impact
Read-only evidence for a post-implementation review: what a change touched, what overlapped with it, and what broke afterwards. It finds correlation, not cause. Say so in the report, and let the people who ran the change judge.
Tables and roles
| Table | What it gives | Readable with |
|---|---|---|
change_request |
The change: CI, planned window (start_date, end_date), state, type, risk |
itil |
task_ci |
Affected CIs of a task (task, ci_item) |
itil |
incident |
Incidents by CI and time | itil |
When access is denied
- A 403 on any of the three tables: the review is not assessable with this identity; say which table.
- Hidden incident fields. The direct links
incident.rfc("Change Request") andincident.caused_by("Caused by Change") are often hidden by ACLs. A query on a hidden field is ignored, not rejected: it returns every incident. Check visibility first (workflow step 4), and fall back to the CI-and-time correlation. - 0 rows means nothing was found with this identity. Rows may be hidden, so don't call a change clean on that alone.
Workflow
Progress checklist:
- [ ] Read the change and its window
- [ ] List its affected CIs
- [ ] Find other changes on those CIs in an overlapping window
- [ ] Check whether incident→change links are readable
- [ ] Find incidents on those CIs after the change
- [ ] Report evidence, separating facts from judgement
- Read the change:
list_records(table_name="change_request", query="number=CHG0000076", fields="sys_id,number,short_description,cmdb_ci,start_date,end_date,state,type,risk", limit=1) - List its affected CIs. The main
cmdb_ciis usually one of them, but not always:list_records(table_name="task_ci", query="task.number=CHG0000076", fields="ci_item,ci_item.name", limit=100) - Overlapping changes on the same CI. A change whose planned window starts before this one ends, and ends after this one starts, overlaps it. Put the change's own window into the query as
gs.dateGenerateliterals:
Changes that list the CI only as an affected CI show up throughlist_records(table_name="change_request", query="cmdb_ci=<ci_sys_id>^start_date<javascript:gs.dateGenerate('2026-08-07','15:00:00')^end_date>javascript:gs.dateGenerate('2026-08-07','14:30:00')^number!=CHG0000076", fields="number,short_description,start_date,end_date,state", limit=50)task_ciinstead:list_records(table_name="task_ci", query="ci_item=<ci_sys_id>^task.sys_class_name=change_request", fields="task.number", limit=100) - Can this identity read the direct links? Request them on a few incidents:
If the result carries alist_records(table_name="incident", fields="number,rfc,caused_by", limit=5)warningnamingrfcorcaused_by, the links are hidden: skip step 5a. - Incidents after the change:
- a. Where the links are readable:
list_records(table_name="incident", query="caused_by=<change_sys_id>^ORrfc=<change_sys_id>", fields="number,short_description,priority,opened_at", limit=50). - b. In every case, incidents on each affected CI opened in the 48 hours after the planned end:
list_records(table_name="incident", query="cmdb_ci=<ci_sys_id>^opened_atBETWEENjavascript:gs.dateGenerate('2026-08-07','15:00:00')@javascript:gs.dateGenerate('2026-08-09','15:00:00')", fields="number,short_description,priority,opened_at,state", limit=50)
- a. Where the links are readable:
- Report:
- the change and its window;
- its affected CIs;
- overlapping changes, a collision risk worth raising before the next window;
- incidents found by direct link, and separately the incidents found by CI and time.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 90 lines · 105 tokens per session scan A 13146d35b041
assessing-change-impact is a skill published in the GitHub repository jschuller/mcp-server-servicenow (24 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 105 tokens to every session and 1,659 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-14.
Other skills, from other repositories
swag
This skill should be used when the user says "add proxy config", "create reverse proxy", "SWAG config", "nginx proxy", "expose service", "proxy configuration", "subdomain config", "subfolder config", "configure SWAG", "list proxy configs", "view proxy config", "edit proxy config", "remove proxy config", "check proxy…
scholar-workflow
Use when the user asks you to search, retrieve, or reason about scholarly sources — papers, patents, books, or standards — guides tool selection, chaining, and cross-domain workflows.
cor-api-tools
Deep reference for all 61 COR MCP API tools — complete argument listings, JSON request/response examples, and common usage patterns for every module.
cor-auth
Authentication cheat sheet for the COR MCP Server — covers both auth modes (email/password and client credentials) step by step, token refresh mechanism, and common auth errors.
cor-mcp-server
Main skill for the COR MCP Server — a comprehensive MCP server that exposes 61 Project COR API tools via FastMCP with dual auth (email/password or client credentials), stdio/SSE transport, and auto-refreshing OAuth 2.0.
cor-mcp-setup
Set up and use the COR MCP Server — 61 tools for Project COR (projects, tasks, clients, time tracking, teams). Covers both auth modes: email/password and API key + client secret.