Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jscraik/Agent-Skills --skill autoresearchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jscraik/Agent-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jscraik/agent-skills/autoresearch)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jscraik/agent-skills/autoresearch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jscraik/agent-skills/autoresearch/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jscraik/agent-skills/autoresearch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jscraik/agent-skills/autoresearch.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.01742 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00697 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00348 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00174 |
Grade A, and why
autoresearch scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Autoresearch
Philosophy
Bounded evidence loop: baseline, hypothesize, patch, score, decide, record. Humans set goal, metric, scope, and stop condition; the agent runs reversible hypotheses inside those bounds.
When To Use
- The user explicitly names
$autoresearch. - The user asks to set up, run, refine, or audit an Autoresearch-style loop.
- The work has target path, editable boundary, metric, verifier, and stop condition.
- The user asks whether a tiny delta, protected regression, or evaluator/data/cache edit is safe to keep.
Avoid
- Generic feature work, keeping unverified experiment changes, or editing fixed harness/evaluation surfaces unless the user changes the benchmark contract.
Execution Boundaries
Owns the experiment contract, ledger, and keep/discard/block recommendation; parent thread owns final decision. Fixed surfaces are benchmark harness, evaluator, data prep, datasets, tokenizer files, and guard commands. Block on unclear metric, boundary, runtime, guard semantics, network/dependency/destructive approvals, contract edits, or unbounded runs.
Inputs
Target path, boundaries, run tag, metric direction, verify/guard commands, stop condition, evidence path, train/selection/test split policy, and optional evaluator contract or min_delta policy.
Deliverables
Ledger plus closeout: hypotheses, patches, commands, scores, baseline, best delta, guard status, changed files, blockers, and schema_version when schema-bound. For skill optimization contracts, also produce best_skill.md, rejected-edits.jsonl, and promotion.json before recommending a canonical edit.
Discovery Interview
- Ask one round at a time.
- Use a plain-language question.
- Explain why this matters for the current skill decision.
- Avoid dumping the whole interview plan at once.
- Read
references/discovery-interview.mdwhen the request is underspecified.
Workflow
- Confirm target, instructions, boundaries, run tag, stop condition, and evidence paths.
- Require goal, scope, metric direction, verify command, and stop condition.
- For
jscraik/autoresearch, readREADME.md,program.md,prepare.py, andtrain.py; normally edit onlytrain.py. - Define parser contract, guard command, held-out checks,
noise_runs, aggregation,min_delta, and confirmation rule. - Baseline first. Never keep an experiment before baseline evidence exists.
- Before each iteration, re-read ledger, logs,
git status, commits, and last kept diff. - Run one reversible hypothesis,
Verify, optionalGuard, then keep/discard/crash/block with evidence and update the ledger. - If attempts plateau, pivot using ledger and git history; at closeout, compare against the original rubric or metric.
- When
references/contract.yamldeclaresoptimization.enabled, treat that block as the authority for split visibility, edit budget, protected paths, anti-cheat checks, and promotion. Write candidates under the evidence root; do not overwrite canonicalSKILL.mduntil the promotion contract passes review.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 137 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A cb3c031759f7
autoresearch is a skill published in the GitHub repository jscraik/Agent-Skills (9 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 1,742 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
academic-paper-review
Use this skill when the user requests to review, analyze, critique, or summarize academic papers, research articles, preprints, or scientific publications. Supports comprehensive structured reviews covering methodology assessment, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and constructive feedback generation.…
agent-matrix-optimizer
Agent skill for matrix-optimizer - invoke with $agent-matrix-optimizer.
medical-agent
Build medical AI agents for clinical decision support, medical record summarization, diagnostic assistance, and healthcare workflow automation.
paper_claw
Fetch, classify, and summarize papers from multiple sources (arXiv, etc.) with AI-powered multi-language summaries and email delivery.
Paper reader
Read and explain a research paper unit (papers/ /) in clear Chinese, embedding original figures and Excalidraw whiteboard diagrams for hard concepts.
scientific-problem-selection
Evaluate and prioritize research questions by importance, novelty, tractability, evidence, resources, ethics, and falsifiability.