Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jscraik/Agent-Skills --skill yamlgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jscraik/Agent-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jscraik/agent-skills/yaml)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jscraik/agent-skills/yaml"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jscraik/agent-skills/yaml/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jscraik/agent-skills/yaml"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jscraik/agent-skills/yaml.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00646 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00258 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00129 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
yaml scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Table of Contents
- When to use
- Required inputs
- Deliverables
- Philosophy
- Procedure
- YAML Guidelines
- Editing Rules
- Validation
- Constraints
- Anti-patterns
- Failure mode
- Gotchas
- References
When to use
- Use for YAML authoring, review, or schema-safe fixes.
- Inputs: target files, consumer tool, required keys, and formatting conventions.
- Deliver valid YAML with stable indentation, key ordering, and scalar notes.
Required inputs
- Target YAML file path and consuming tool or schema.
- Required keys, scalar expectations, and formatting conventions.
- Validation command or parser expected to consume the file.
Deliverables
- Minimal YAML edit preserving meaningful ordering and comments.
- Validation evidence from parser, schema, or consuming tool.
- Notes for indentation, scalar coercion, or compatibility risk.
Philosophy
- Prefer schema truth and low-churn edits over clever rewrites.
Procedure
- Confirm the consumer schema and current key paths.
- Make the smallest compatible edit.
- Validate before closeout.
YAML Guidelines
- Use spaces only; never use tabs for indentation.
- Keep indentation width consistent within a file.
- Quote values that could be misread as booleans, numbers, dates, or null.
- Prefer block style for complex mappings and sequences.
Editing Rules
- Minimize whitespace-only churn unless formatting is the task.
- Preserve key order when downstream tooling expects logical ordering.
- Avoid mixing flow style with block style in the same section.
Validation
- Run the relevant parser/schema/tool checks for touched files.
- Fail fast: stop at the first failed gate and report exact blocker evidence.
Constraints
- If schema compatibility is uncertain, stop and confirm constraints.
- Redact secrets and do not run destructive or network commands unless explicitly approved.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 99 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 7b8b26a81ab5
yaml is a skill published in the GitHub repository jscraik/Agent-Skills (9 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 646 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-code-analyzer
Agent skill for code-analyzer - invoke with $agent-code-analyzer.
worker-integration
Worker-Agent integration for intelligent task dispatch and performance tracking.
agui-dotnet-streaming-chat
Get started with the AG-UI .NET SDK: bootstrap and run your first streaming-chat app (client + server) with the AG-UI .NET NuGet packages (AGUI.Client, AGUI.Server, AGUI.Formatting, AGUI.Abstractions). USE FOR: which packages to install and how to wire them; constructing an AGUIChatClient against an endpoint and…
agui-dotnet-protobuf
Use the protobuf wire transport (instead of the default Server-Sent Events) for an AG-UI connection with the AG-UI .NET SDK — a compact binary event stream negotiated via the Accept header. USE FOR: making an AGUIChatClient prefer protobuf by wiring an AGUIEventStreamHandler with ProtobufEventStreamFormatter (then…
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
moai-ref-ui-polish
UI polish and interface-completion reference: the small visual details — concentric border radius, optical alignment, shadow-vs-border, motion easing, typography smoothing, tabular numbers, icon stroke weight, hit areas — that separate polished interfaces from generic ones. Agent-extending skill that amplifies…