Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jstoup111/ai-conductor --skill rebasegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jstoup111/ai-conductorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jstoup111/ai-conductor/rebase)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jstoup111/ai-conductor/rebase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jstoup111/ai-conductor/rebase.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 227 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.03005 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.01503 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00601 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00300 |
Grade A, and why
rebase scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 288 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Purpose
Resumes a paused rebase that stopped on a conflict hunk. The conductor's
finish-time runRebaseStep calls this skill when git rebase exits mid-flight
(exit code 1 with conflict markers in the working tree). The operator can also
invoke it manually as /rebase.
This skill has ONE job: resolve the conflict markers in the affected files,
stage the fixes, and run git rebase --continue to advance — repeating for any
additional conflict hunks — until the rebase completes cleanly or a hunk is
judged unsafe to resolve automatically.
The conductor retries this skill up to a configured cap (default 3) before issuing a HALT. Each invocation is one bounded attempt.
Practices
1. Confirm Rebase State
Verify a rebase is actually in progress before touching anything:
git status
test -d "$(git rev-parse --git-path rebase-merge)" || test -d "$(git rev-parse --git-path rebase-apply)"
(--git-path resolves the state dir correctly in linked worktrees, where .git
is a file and ls .git/rebase-merge/ always fails. Note that rev-parse --git-path prints the path unconditionally — only test -d on it proves a
rebase is in progress.)
If no rebase is in progress, emit {"resolved": false, "reason": "no rebase in progress"} and stop.
2. Capture Replay Intent Before Editing
Before touching a conflicted file, capture an evidence ledger for the replay
source commit currently being applied. REBASE_HEAD identifies the commit
being replayed during a paused rebase; record its object ID and its parent
commit before making edits:
git rev-parse REBASE_HEAD
git rev-parse REBASE_HEAD^
git show --format=fuller --stat REBASE_HEAD
git diff --find-renames REBASE_HEAD^ REBASE_HEAD
Read the source commit and its parent context/diff to establish what behavior the replay source commit intended to introduce or change. Then read the upstream context that is currently checked out and caused the conflict:
git show --format=fuller --stat HEAD
git log --oneline --decorate -n 20 HEAD
git diff --find-renames REBASE_HEAD^ HEAD
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 288 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 114c76daf0d5
rebase is a skill published in the GitHub repository jstoup111/ai-conductor (7 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 3,005 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
prowler-commit
Creates professional git commits following conventional-commits format. Trigger: When creating commits, after completing code changes, when user asks to commit.
gh-auth-isolation
Safely manage multiple GitHub identities (EMU + personal) in agent workflows.
comet-github
A routing guide for Comet-related GitHub work. It directs requests about pull requests, issues, CI failures, ideas, and fixes to the appropriate review or implementation process.
github-skill
Work with GitHub via the gh CLI — clone repositories, create/list/merge pull requests, create/list issues, and run any other gh command (API calls, workflow runs, releases, repo administration). List operations return parsed JSON.
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
codex-autoresearch
Run autonomous, measurable experiments in a Git repository: change one hypothesis, verify a numeric metric, keep improvements, and revert failures. Use when the user wants Codex to keep iterating toward a numeric target in the foreground or as a detached background run. Do not use for ordinary one-shot coding…