Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jstoup111/ai-conductor --skill simplifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jstoup111/ai-conductorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jstoup111/ai-conductor/simplify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jstoup111/ai-conductor/simplify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jstoup111/ai-conductor/simplify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jstoup111/ai-conductor/simplify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jstoup111/ai-conductor/simplify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 9 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.02824 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.01130 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00565 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00282 |
Grade A, and why
simplify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 248 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Purpose
Runs at pipeline batch boundaries. Catches accumulated duplication, complexity, over-engineering, and domain-modelling defects before they compound across batches. Enforces "dry business logic, not dry code" — extract shared behavior, not shared shape.
This is NOT a full codebase audit. It is scoped to the current batch's changes, except that changed tests must be compared with existing tests at the same production seam.
Practices
1. Scope Detection
Identify files changed in the current batch:
git diff <batch-start-commit>..HEAD --name-only
Keep non-test analysis limited to these files. For each changed or added test, additionally
inspect existing tests at the same production seam; do not scan unrelated code or tests.
The batch-start commit is available from .pipeline/audit-trail/batch-N/ or from the
pipeline's progress log.
2. Duplication Check
Look for duplicated business logic across batch-changed files. Distinguish between:
| Type | Example | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Duplicated behavior | Same validation logic in two services | Must extract |
| Duplicated shape | Two serializers with similar structure | Leave alone |
| Copy-paste with tweaks | Same method with 1-2 param differences | Extract with parameters — except a declared replication's exact mapped source/target pair alone is not an extract-with-parameters finding. Still flag undeclared duplication or similarity outside the declared target set; with no declaration, apply this row unchanged. A declared pair may retain an extraction finding when rationale beyond the declared replication merits it. |
Flag when 3+ similar blocks exist across different files. Two similar blocks in the same file are a judgment call — flag only if the logic is non-trivial.
Before recommending extraction, inlining, or a competing abstraction, consult the applicable focused pattern basis (for example, the approved plan, architecture decision, or declared replication contract). Flag only a material, unapproved departure from that basis. Accept a variation the basis allows, a verified case where the proposed extraction does not fit the accepted design, or a departure that the operator or accepted artifact explicitly authorizes. This alignment check does not turn shared shape into shared behavior: extract only shared business behavior.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago Changed · +34 lines · +5 tokens per session cb54e9f84844
- 2mo ago First seen · 214 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 9a451a1a29e3
simplify is a skill published in the GitHub repository jstoup111/ai-conductor (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 2,824 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…