Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add juicesharp/rpiv-pi --skill outline-test-casesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/juicesharp/rpiv-piWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/juicesharp/rpiv-pi/outline-test-cases)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/juicesharp/rpiv-pi/outline-test-cases"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/juicesharp/rpiv-pi/outline-test-cases/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/juicesharp/rpiv-pi/outline-test-cases"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/juicesharp/rpiv-pi/outline-test-cases.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.04280 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.02140 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00856 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00428 |
Grade A, and why
outline-test-cases scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 349 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Outline Test Cases
You are tasked with discovering all testable features in a project and creating a folder outline under .rpiv/test-cases/. Each feature gets its own folder with a _meta.md file containing discovered routes, endpoints, scope decisions, and domain context. A root README.md summarizes the full project outline. No test case content is generated — use write-test-cases per feature to fill the folders.
Two modes: Fresh (no existing outline — full discovery and checkpoint) and Incremental (existing outline found — discovery with prior context, diff-based checkpoint). Discovery always runs in both modes.
Initial Setup
When this command is invoked, respond with:
I'll discover all testable features in this project and create a folder outline
under .rpiv/test-cases/. Let me check for existing outlines and analyze the codebase.
Use the current working directory as the target project by default. If the user provides a specific directory path as an argument, use that instead.
Steps
Step 1: Read files & detect mode
- If the user mentions specific files (existing test cases, architecture docs, READMEs), read them FULLY first
- IMPORTANT: Use the Read tool WITHOUT limit/offset parameters to read entire files
- CRITICAL: Read these files yourself in the main context before invoking any agents
Mode Detection
Check for existing outline data:
- Glob for
**/_meta.mdwith path set to.rpiv/test-cases/in the target directory (dot-prefixed directories must be targeted directly) - If no
_meta.mdfiles found → Fresh mode. Proceed to Step 2. - If
_meta.mdfiles found → Incremental mode. Read them ALL and extract:- Existing feature list (names, slugs, modules, routes, endpoints)
- Scope exclusions from
## Scope Decisionssections - Previous checkpoint Q&A from
## Checkpoint Historysections - Generated date from frontmatter
Report detected mode:
[Fresh]: No existing outline found. Will run full discovery.
[Incremental]: Found [N] existing feature outlines from [generated date]. Will re-discover with prior context and highlight changes.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 349 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 08dee24fe16a
outline-test-cases is a skill published in the GitHub repository juicesharp/rpiv-pi (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 4,280 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.