Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add juliusz-cwiakalski/agentic-delivery-os --skill write-test-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/juliusz-cwiakalski/agentic-delivery-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/juliusz-cwiakalski/agentic-delivery-os/write-test-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/juliusz-cwiakalski/agentic-delivery-os/write-test-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/juliusz-cwiakalski/agentic-delivery-os/write-test-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/juliusz-cwiakalski/agentic-delivery-os/write-test-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/juliusz-cwiakalski/agentic-delivery-os/write-test-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 11 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00897 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00449 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00179 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
write-test-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
User invocation: /write-test-plan <workItemRef> [options]
Options: focus=backend, nfr-only, no-manual, etc.
The TEST PLAN:
- Ensures full coverage of capabilities, interfaces, and acceptance criteria
- Aligns with implementation plan phases
- Maps scenarios to test types per
.ai/rules/testing-strategy.md
<discovery_rules>
Given workItemRef:
- Search for folder:
doc/changes/**/*--<workItemRef>--*/ - Locate spec:
chg-<workItemRef>-spec.md(required) - Locate plan:
chg-<workItemRef>-plan.md(optional) - Read:
.ai/rules/testing-strategy.md(required)
Files:
- Spec:
chg-<workItemRef>-spec.md - Plan:
chg-<workItemRef>-plan.md - Test Plan:
chg-<workItemRef>-test-plan.md - Branch:
<change.type>/<workItemRef>/<slug></discovery_rules>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 93 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 3fd91d3d4186
write-test-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository juliusz-cwiakalski/agentic-delivery-os (38 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 897 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Verification & Quality Assurance
Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.
github-actions
Use when authoring or fixing GitHub Actions CI/CD — workflows under .github/workflows, triggers, job matrix, caching, token permissions, OIDC cloud deploys, environment gates, reusable workflows. NOT the Dockerfile or image build strategy (that is docker), NOT the branching model (that is git-workflow), NOT release…
ops-nuke-cicd
Designs and troubleshoots NUKE-based CI/CD pipelines for .NET services. Use when refactoring target graphs, splitting test flows, publishing reports, or diagnosing slow pipelines.
ai-agents-empirical-probe-toolkit
Prove-it methods for this repo. Six recipes for runtime-contract probes, guard and threshold calibration, eval A/B, docs-vs-reality audits, reproduce-on-main CI triage, and negative-control test design, each with a worked example from repo history. Use when you say probe the runtime contract, calibrate this guard…
code-qualities-assessment
Assess code maintainability through 5 foundational qualities (cohesion, coupling, encapsulation, testability, non-redundancy) with quantifiable scoring rubrics. Works at method/class/module levels across multiple languages. Produces markdown reports with remediation guidance. Use when you ask to "assess…
ai-agents-portability-campaign
Execute cross-harness hook changes for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot CLI using the settled official contract, versioned probes, generators, and runtime tests. Use for run the portability campaign, port hooks to a new harness, copilot hook timeout regression, or new copilot cli release, recheck the contract. Do NOT…