Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to junghwaYang/oh-my-codex. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/junghwaYang/oh-my-codex/main/.codex/skills/reviewer/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/junghwaYang/oh-my-codexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/junghwayang/oh-my-codex/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/junghwayang/oh-my-codex/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/junghwayang/oh-my-codex/reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00463 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00231 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00093 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Reviewer Skill
Code review with structured feedback.
When to Use
- Before merging PRs
- After completing a feature (self-review)
- When user asks for code review
- Quality gate checks
When NOT to Use
- During active development (let them finish first)
- For trivial changes
- When user explicitly skips review
Review Categories
| Category | Prefix | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| Security | SEC- | CRITICAL |
| Performance | PERF- | HIGH |
| Correctness | BUG- | HIGH |
| Maintainability | MAINT- | MEDIUM |
| Style | STYLE- | LOW |
Workflow
1. SCAN
- Read all changed files
- Understand the intent
2. ANALYZE
- Check each category
- Note issues with severity
3. REPORT
- Group by severity
- Provide actionable feedback
- Suggest fixes, not just problems
4. SUMMARIZE
- Overall assessment
- Blocking vs non-blocking issues
Review Output Format
## Code Review: {scope}
### Summary
{1-2 sentence overall assessment}
### Critical Issues
- **SEC-001**: {issue}
- File: {path}:{line}
- Fix: {suggestion}
### High Priority
- **PERF-001**: {issue}
- File: {path}:{line}
- Fix: {suggestion}
### Suggestions
- **MAINT-001**: {issue}
- {suggestion}
### Verdict
[ ] ✅ Approve
[ ] ⚠️ Approve with comments
[ ] ❌ Request changes
Security Checklist (SEC-)
- No hardcoded secrets
- Input validation present
- SQL injection protection
- XSS prevention
- Auth checks in place
Performance Checklist (PERF-)
- No N+1 queries
- Appropriate indexing
- No memory leaks
- Efficient algorithms
See Also
- references/security-check.md
- references/performance-check.md
- references/style-check.md
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 92 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 8d29c70c1c6a
reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository junghwaYang/oh-my-codex (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 463 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…