claude-scientific-writer: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/scientific-critical-thinking/SKILL.md

scientific-critical-thinking is a skill for Claude Code from K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer. It costs 63 tokens per session (1,788 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide to judging scientific claims by examining study design, statistics, evidence quality, bias, and confounding factors. Confounding occurs when another factor may explain an observed result.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess experiments, research papers, systematic reviews, and scientific claims with frameworks such as GRADE and Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment.
Why use it?
It helps distinguish strong evidence from results that may be unreliable because of flawed methods, biased measurements, or unsupported conclusions.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

This is K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on claude-scientific-writer itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything claude-scientific-writer configures →

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is python scripts/generate_schematic.py "GRADE evidence assessment flowchart with downgrade and upgrade factors" -o figures/grade_flowchart.png --doc-type report.

About the project

Claude Scientific Writer is an AI-assisted research and writing tool that searches literature and produces documents such as scientific papers, reports, posters, grant proposals, and reviews with citations. Researchers and technical writers can use it as a Claude Code plugin, Python package, or command-line tool, with the catalogue entries defining agent workflows for it.

K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer · 2,327 stars · on GitHub · k-dense.ai

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer/main/.claude/skills/scientific-critical-thinking/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for scientific-critical-thinking

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/k-dense-ai/claude-scientific-writer/scientific-critical-thinking/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/k-dense-ai/claude-scientific-writer/scientific-critical-thinking)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/k-dense-ai/claude-scientific-writer/scientific-critical-thinking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/k-dense-ai/claude-scientific-writer/scientific-critical-thinking/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for scientific-critical-thinking

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/k-dense-ai/claude-scientific-writer/scientific-critical-thinking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/k-dense-ai/claude-scientific-writer/scientific-critical-thinking.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 63 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,788 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00063 $0.01788
Opus 5 $0.00032 $0.00894
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.00358
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00179

Measured 13d ago against content hash e615da7e6a90, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

scientific-critical-thinking scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/scientific-critical-thinking/SKILL.md · 181 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 181 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Scientific Critical Thinking

Overview

Critical thinking is a systematic process for evaluating scientific rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, and evidence quality using GRADE and Cochrane ROB frameworks. Apply this skill for critical analysis of scientific claims.

When to Use This Skill

This skill should be used when:

  • Evaluating research methodology and experimental design
  • Assessing statistical validity and evidence quality
  • Identifying biases and confounding in studies
  • Reviewing scientific claims and conclusions
  • Conducting systematic reviews or meta-analyses
  • Applying GRADE or Cochrane risk of bias assessments
  • Providing critical analysis of research papers

Visual Aids (Optional)

Only add figures when the user explicitly requests a diagram (for example, a GRADE flowchart, bias decision tree, or evidence-quality framework).

When figures help:

  • Critical thinking framework diagrams
  • Bias identification decision trees
  • Evidence quality assessment flowcharts
  • GRADE or risk-of-bias evaluation frameworks

How to create figures:

  • Preferred: Use the scientific-schematics skill for AI-generated diagrams from a natural-language description
  • Alternative: Build figures in your usual tools (draw.io, PowerPoint, matplotlib, etc.)

From the scientific-schematics skill directory, with OPENROUTER_API_KEY set:

python scripts/generate_schematic.py "GRADE evidence assessment flowchart with downgrade and upgrade factors" -o figures/grade_flowchart.png --doc-type report

Disclosure: AI schematic generation sends your prompt to OpenRouter (a third-party API). Do not include unpublished sensitive details unless that transmission is appropriate for your project.


Core Capabilities

Seven capability areas, each with the questions to ask and what the answers imply, are in references/core_capabilities.md:

Read the full file on GitHub · 181 lines

Files

What ships with it

7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 13d ago First seen · 181 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A e615da7e6a90

Subscribe to this mod's changes

scientific-critical-thinking is a skill published in the GitHub repository K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer (2,327 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 1,788 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

health-nutrition-expert

Apply cutting-edge 2025 nutrition science on longevity, metabolic health, gut microbiome, and evidence-based dietary patterns for optimal vitality and disease prevention. Use when planning a diet, evaluating a nutrition claim, or applying evidence-based guidance on longevity, metabolic, and gut health.

frankxai/claude-skills-library · 62 tokens

tabpfn-regress

Run a TabPFN regression baseline, generate the first submission, then optimize with GBT ensembles and regression-specific post-processing (clipping, target transforms, rank blending). Use after tabpfn-explore has prepared the data and CV folds.

dianaprior/kaggle-competition-agent-skill · 55 tokens

tabpfn-explore

EDA, data profiling, adversarial validation, preprocessing checks, CV scheme setup, and API budget verification for tabular Kaggle competitions. Run at the start of every new competition before any modeling.

dianaprior/kaggle-competition-agent-skill · 45 tokens

drug-discovery

Drug discovery: ChEMBL search, drug-likeness, interactions.

NousResearch/hermes-agent · 19 tokens

build-interactive-explainers

A guide for building interactive explainers, calculators, and simulations driven by an executable model. Users change inputs, steps, states, or events to understand a rule or see how a process develops over time.

EverMind-AI/Raven · 102 tokens

acl-experiments

Use when designing or auditing experiments for an ACL paper, covering tuned LLM baselines, multi-dataset and multilingual evaluation, statistical significance and variance, human evaluation with agreement reporting, contamination and prompt-sensitivity controls, ablations, and error-analysis expectations in NLP…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 59 tokens