Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kalyvask/winning-writing --skill pitch-coachgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kalyvask/winning-writingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kalyvask/winning-writing/pitch-coach)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kalyvask/winning-writing/pitch-coach"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kalyvask/winning-writing/pitch-coach/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kalyvask/winning-writing/pitch-coach"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kalyvask/winning-writing/pitch-coach.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00121 | $0.01196 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.00598 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00239 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00120 |
Grade A, and why
pitch-coach scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pitch coach
Source: points/frameworks.md (pitch and S.H.I.T. sections), points/kramon-master.md section VIII.
Two pitch modes
This skill handles both:
- Company pitches — VC, customer, journalist
- Personal pitches — LinkedIn bio, "tell me about yourself," cover letter, founding-story essay
The frameworks overlap. S.H.I.T. applies to both.
The 7-part pitch (companies)
- What it does — plain English, one sentence, grandmother test
- Differentiation — what's already out there and why you're different
- Customer examples and endorsements — specific names, specific numbers
- Market size and funding — TAM, dollars raised, runway
- Superhero story — why you are the one to do this
- News hook — why this is timely
- Bigger trend — connect to the wave (especially if you're small)
The six-word test
Summarize the product in six words. If you can't, you don't know it well enough yet.
Examples:
- "Edited Pulitzer winners. Now teaching business leaders." (Kramon's bio)
- "For sale: baby shoes, never worn." (Hemingway)
If the user can't pass this test, work on it before anything else.
S.H.I.T. framework
Apply to both company and personal narratives:
- Simple — especially if your background is complex, simplify
- Heroic — position as protagonist; will they prevail? Stay tuned
- Inevitable — on the right side of history
- Timely — doing this now for a reason
Mission-statement template (4 sentences)
- "This problem is a dire threat, even if most people don't know it."
- "My company is developing the most elegant solution: [how it works]."
- "We might fail, but the mission is so important we must try."
- "Call to action: [specific ask — invest, join, legislate, hire me]."
Personal pitch — extra rules
LinkedIn bios and "tell me about yourself" answers have their own failure modes:
- Don't let the bots brand you. If you don't define your brand, someone else will.
- Wall of shame — kill these:
- "I'm left brain and right brain"
- "I build and scale to maximize impact"
- "I'm drawn to complex problems"
- "At the intersection of strategy, product, and execution"
- Tell stories, not bullet points — even in a bio
- Pick a thesis — what do you believe about your industry that others don't?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 102 lines · 121 tokens per session scan A 5c2113fc65b5
pitch-coach is a skill published in the GitHub repository kalyvask/winning-writing (13 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 121 tokens to every session and 1,196 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
project-memory
Generate a project-specific context file from a brief so an AI assistant remembers your editorial constraints, voice, audience, and quality bar across sessions.
project-retrospective
Generate a LESSONS.md from a finished project: what worked, what didn't, what to reuse, what to retire — formatted for next-project carry-over.
template-selector
Recommend the right skill bundle, agent, and workflow sequence for a new project — so media professionals can start producing instead of browsing a 394-skill library.
multi-author-harmonizer
Reviews a text written or assembled by multiple authors and produces a detailed inconsistency report — flagging voice shifts, terminology mismatches, tonal clashes, and formatting discrepancies — with specific harmonisation recommendations for each.
jargon-flagger
Scans a draft and flags every instance of technical jargon, unexplained acronyms, and insider language that a general-audience reader would not understand — with a plain-language alternative for each.
passive-voice-checker
Identifies every passive-voice construction in a draft, assesses whether each weakens or serves the prose, and offers active-voice alternatives for those that should be changed — while leaving justified passives alone.