analyze

analyze is a skill for Claude Code from kangig94/coral. It costs 25 tokens per session (1,341 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A structured process for investigating a software project, missing requirements, or the root cause of a problem.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect project files, evaluate requirement gaps, diagnose causes, verify reported issues, and record findings with their sources.
Why use it?
It creates a dated analysis record and requires findings to be tied to checked evidence instead of guesses.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions Codex.

Part of the coral plugin — 12 skills, 10 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to inspect project files, evaluate requirement gaps, diagnose causes, verify reported issues, and record findings with their sources.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/kangig94/coral/analyze
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add kangig94/coral --skill analyze
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kangig94/coral

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install coral, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 12 skills, 10 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for analyze

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kangig94/coral/analyze.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kangig94/coral/analyze)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kangig94/coral/analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kangig94/coral/analyze.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 25 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,341 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Prompt Injection · line 71
    Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.
    Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00025 $0.01341
Opus 5 $0.00013 $0.00671
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00268
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00134

Measured 8d ago against content hash bc44483f8b9c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

analyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

clients/skills/analyze/SKILL.md · 97 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 97 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Deep Analysis & Investigation

Strip the --delegate flag before passing the prompt to the execution path. </Argument_Routing>

Phase 1 — Create Analysis File

Write CORAL_PROJECT/analysis/{YYYY-MM-DD}-{topic}.md with header:

# Analysis: {topic}

Date: {YYYY-MM-DD}
Question: {user's original request}
  • Topic: 2-4 word kebab-case (e.g., auth-flow-gaps, ci-pipeline-root-cause)
  • Collision: same date + topic → append -2, -3

Phase 2 — Investigation Steps

For each step in the table below, in order:

  1. Evaluate — check "Needed when" against the user's request AND prior findings. Skip if unneeded.
  2. Scope — determine target files/modules. Never run unscoped. If a step discovers new facets, carry them into subsequent step evaluation.
  3. Execute — run via active mode (see Mode below).
  4. Post-process — apply quality gates:
    • Verify CRITICAL/HIGH file:line references (Read cited location, drop incorrect)
    • Drop speculative findings without code evidence. Findings about unchanged code: downgrade and move to ### Peripheral Findings
    • Tag provenance (code trace / test behavior / git history / inference / assumption). Assumption-only → downgrade one level
    • Record finding flow: "N initial → M after gates → K verified [code: X, inference: Y, assumption: Z]"
  5. Append — write under the step's output section heading.

Wait for each step's result before evaluating the next. At least one step must run.

Read the full file on GitHub · 97 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 97 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A bc44483f8b9c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

analyze is a skill published in the GitHub repository kangig94/coral (11 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 1,341 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

investigate

Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Four phases: investigate, analyze, hypothesize, implement. Iron Law: no fixes without root cause. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT debug…

GCWing/BitFun · 112 tokens

cherry-electron-dev

Develop, fix, and profile Cherry Studio in a tracked Electron instance. Use for everyday implementation, UI and interaction work, bug fixing, runtime debugging, DevTools inspection, lag or jank investigation, CPU and memory monitoring, leak checks, and startup-performance analysis; reuse a verified workspace instance…

CherryHQ/cherry-studio · 75 tokens

cherry-assistant-guide

A guide for looking up Cherry Studio's product details and diagnosing problems such as connection failures, setup errors, and runtime issues.

CherryHQ/cherry-studio · 68 tokens

cherry-studio-feedback

A guide for handling Cherry Studio bug reports, interface problems, user-experience issues, and feature suggestions.

CherryHQ/cherry-studio · 37 tokens

memstack-development-performance-audit

Use this skill when the user says 'performance audit', 'why is it slow', 'optimize performance', 'page speed', 'Core Web Vitals', 'lighthouse', 'load time', or needs to diagnose and fix frontend or backend performance issues. Do NOT use for code reviews or security audits.

cwinvestments/memstack · 69 tokens

debug

Use this skill to locate a runtime bug. Add targeted instrumentation, collect reproduction evidence, and confirm the root cause before changing code.

GCWing/BitFun · 28 tokens