Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kayforkind/reimagine-itnpx agentmods add skills/kayforkind/reimagine-it/auditWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kayforkind/reimagine-it/audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kayforkind/reimagine-it/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kayforkind/reimagine-it/audit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 47 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 65 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 66 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 67 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00108 | $0.00805 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00054 | $0.00402 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00161 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
reimagine-it-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/reimagine-it audit
Parent: ../SKILL.md — the full Content-Derived Design engine. This sub-skill handles only the deterministic quality check.
Runs npx reimagine-it audit — 19 checks across 6 categories (src/audit.js; Python scripts/audit.py is the CI mirror):
| Category | Checks | What it catches |
|---|---|---|
| Typography | 3 | Banned default fonts, type-scale range, measure > 65ch |
| Palette | 3 | Palette drift, transition: all, un-styled ::selection |
| Motion | 4 | Outline removal, missing prefers-reduced-motion, missing :focus-visible, non-compositor animation |
| Content | 4 | Placeholder copy, vibe adjectives, emoji farm, <br><br> spacing |
| Structure | 3 | CDN, external font fetch, figure system doing no work |
| Performance | 2 | Images without dimensions, long pages without content-visibility |
Usage
# Agent
/reimagine-it audit path/to/page.html
# CLI (Node — no Python required)
npx reimagine-it audit gold/webpage/after.html
npx reimagine-it audit gold/webpage/after.html --verbose
npx reimagine-it audit gold/webpage/after.html --json
# CI mirror
python scripts/audit_all.py
Exit codes
| Code | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 0 | CLEAN — no issues |
| 1 | WARNINGS — advisory only, no blockers |
| 2 | FAIL — must fix before shipping |
Procedure
- If the user passed a file path, run
python scripts/audit.py <path>. - If no path, run
python scripts/audit_all.pyto audit all gold files. - Report the verdict with a summary table.
- For each failure, name the specific rule and the fix.
- If
--verbose, show per-category breakdown. - If
--json, output machine-readable JSON for CI.
Must not
- Use an LLM for the check — this is deterministic Python only
- Skip the craft-floor rules (MOT-02, MOT-03 are hard blockers)
- Report "clean" without actually running the script
- Invent checks not in
scripts/audit.py
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed dc215039b6d7
- yesterday Changed 0bba597f12b8
- 2d ago Changed bdf2b5185510
- 7d ago First seen · 95 lines · 108 tokens per session scan A 89ecf2ced413
reimagine-it-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository Kayforkind/reimagine-it (94 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 108 tokens to every session and 805 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
visual-qa
Runs rigorous visual QA across web, terminal, and paginated surfaces with screenshot evidence and a verdict. Use for any UI build or change, or when asked whether a page, component, or TUI looks right.
accessibility-audit
Use when wCAG compliance audit — semantic HTML, ARIA, keyboard navigation, color contrast, and screen reader testing. Use when working with accessibility audit.
verify-against-spec
Cross-checks a design spec against implementation, including SwiftUI visual fidelity against a design-contract's §9 canonical frames and captures/. Apple/design-contract-specific — for a non-visual or non-Apple spec-coverage check, use a generic equivalent instead. Use when finishing a spec-driven Apple UI feature, or…
fmcp-ds-audit-orchestrator
Figma ekranlarını 5 kategori açısından platform-agnostic denetler (DS compliance / a11y / drift / visual QA / impact). Read-only çalışır; bulguları raporlar, düzeltmeleri sadece önerir — mutation için onay + ayrı agent. Her platformda çalışır. Condensed-first: Essentials bölümü %80 case'i kapsar, Advanced sadece edge…
balise-content-test
Stress-tests selected Figma screens, frames, and components with difficult but realistic content and data. Use to audit, generate, or repair resilience cases involving text length, missing values, numeric extremes, localization, RTL, Unicode, text enlargement, variable media, narrow layouts, wrapping, truncation, and…
visual-testing
Visual testing, UI verification, and design comparison using screenshots and Figma integration. Use when the user wants to verify UI appearance, compare with Figma designs, test responsive layouts, check for visual regressions, or validate design implementation.