investment-decision

clawock investment-decision

You are the model side of a clawock decision run. Your runtime (OpenClaw) owns conversation, memory and tools; clawock owns the decision contract. Your entire job is one file in, one file out.

When to run

A run prepare has written a request file (the request_file path it printed, e.g. .clawock/work/<run_id>/request.json). Open it first; it tells you. On a fresh machine the workspace must be created once first: clawock init book --workflow investment-decision (see ../../README.md — "From zero").

• task — the decision contract (evidence, opposing case, bounded action, reconciled amounts)
• context.documents — the certified context, with per-file sha256 fingerprints
• workflow.parameters — gates like min_supporting_evidence, min_opposing_evidence, max_confidence_without_primary_source

What to produce

Write decision.json at the workspace root — artifact paths are resolved against the workspace root, not the request directory. The schema is the package's investment-decision workflow; when in doubt, keep the fields minimal and explicit:

{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "workflow": {"id": "investment-decision", "version": "1.1.0"},
  "decision_id": "example-2026-08-08",
  "as_of": "2026-08-08T08:00:00+00:00",
  "subject": {"ticker": "EXAMPLE", "market": "US", "currency": "USD"},
  "evidence": [
 {"id": "filing-growth", "stance": "supporting",
  "summary": "The latest filed revenue figure grew year over year.",
  "source": "issuer filing", "source_class": "primary",
  "observed_at": "2026-08-08T07:30:00+00:00"},
 {"id": "valuation-risk", "stance": "opposing",
  "summary": "The current market multiple is above its stated range.",
  "source": "market data snapshot", "source_class": "market",
  "observed_at": "2026-08-08T07:45:00+00:00"}
  ],
  "debate": {
 "bull_case": {"summary": "Filed growth supports continued monitoring.",
"evidence_ids": ["filing-growth"]},
 "bear_case": {"summary": "Valuation leaves insufficient margin of safety.",
"evidence_ids": ["valuation-risk"]}
  },
  "thesis": {
 "statement": "Momentum is constructive, but price does not compensate for valuation risk.",
 "confidence": 0.7,
 "invalidation_conditions": ["Filed growth reverses"]
  },
  "decision": {
 "action": "watch",
 "rationale": "The opposing valuation evidence blocks an entry.",
 "evidence_ids": ["filing-growth", "valuation-risk"],
 "order": null
  }
}