Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/kdlbs/kandev/code-reviewnpx skills add kdlbs/kandev --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kdlbs/kandevWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00031 | $0.03414 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01707 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00683 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00341 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 265 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 73c09ac466ac
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository kdlbs/kandev (710 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 3,414 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
process-builder
Scaffold new babysitter process definitions following SDK patterns, proper structure, and best practices. Guides the 3-phase workflow from research to implementation.
retrospect-external-babysitter-run
For a repository in the babysitter-users catalog, locate its babysitter processes and any committed runs (.a5c/runs/ /) and perform a retrospective on a chosen run -- what went well, what failed, process suggestions, quality of effect design, breakpoint patterns -- mirroring the /babysitter:retrospect workflow but…
pr-integration-test
Design, implement, and validate Intelligent Terminal integration tests for a target pull request or regression. Use when asked to add PR integration tests, convert a bug fix into E2E coverage, prove existing behavior still works, map tests to the release checklist, or verify E2E reports mark checklist cases complete.
ultraapp-interview
Use when the user opens a Forge tab in the claw-orchestrator dashboard to start building a new ultraapp. Drives a structured Q&A interview that produces a complete AppSpec, then signals readiness to build.
test-driven-development
Strict RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle enforcement. Tests are never skipped or deferred. Run mode only, never watch mode. Exit code evidence mandatory.
product-brief-creation
Create comprehensive product briefs from market, domain, and technical research.