Seshat-BI: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/friendly-pr-reviewer/SKILL.md

friendly-pr-reviewer is a skill for Claude Code from Kemetra/Seshat-BI. It costs 173 tokens per session (2,839 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A plain-language summary tool for a pull request (PR), the proposed set of code changes reviewed before merging. It explains an existing governance review without changing its results.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to explain one PR's review envelope and committed readiness state, including the affected stages and exactly one next action.
Why use it?
It makes technical review output easier to understand by showing what changed, which readiness checks passed or were blocked, what findings are new or resolved, and who must approve.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

This is Kemetra/Seshat-BI's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on Seshat-BI itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything Seshat-BI configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to Kemetra/Seshat-BI. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Kemetra/Seshat-BI/main/.claude/skills/friendly-pr-reviewer/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kemetra/Seshat-BI

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for friendly-pr-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kemetra/seshat-bi/friendly-pr-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kemetra/seshat-bi/friendly-pr-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kemetra/seshat-bi/friendly-pr-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kemetra/seshat-bi/friendly-pr-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for friendly-pr-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kemetra/seshat-bi/friendly-pr-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kemetra/seshat-bi/friendly-pr-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 173 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,839 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00173 $0.02839
Opus 5 $0.00086 $0.01419
Sonnet 5 $0.00035 $0.00568
Haiku 4.5 $0.00017 $0.00284

Measured 11d ago against content hash daa5f7ee0c2e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

friendly-pr-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/friendly-pr-reviewer/SKILL.md · 208 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 208 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

friendly-pr-reviewer

Module Contract -- Friendly PR Reviewer

  • Authority category: Product Module
  • Capability level: read-only (exactly one of read-only | artifact-writing | execution-capable)
  • Product layer: cross-cutting (guards no stage, gates no promotion; a presentation companion, sibling to F025/F036/F037)
  • Roadmap feature: not yet assigned -- a human assigns the F-number at scheduling (this skill does NOT self-assign one; see spec.md status line). On-disk spec: specs/130-pr-reviewer
  • Owner: the repo maintainer / PR reviewer (a named human)
  • Status: Authored

What it does (one line)

Reads one PR's already-produced review envelope + committed readiness truth, and RENDERS a plain-language narrative of what changed and what it means -- never a merge-ready verdict, never a score.

Core Authority it READS

It reads; it never writes these, and it re-derives nothing.

  • The build_review_result review envelope (review_integration.py) -- outcome (ok/blocked only), checks_run, changed_files, changed_readiness_state, affected_stages, findings[], blocking_findings[], next_actions[], run_boundary, result_digest.
  • The SARIF finding identity (sarif.finding_fingerprint / sarif_document) -- the canonical new-vs-existing key, reused directly for the temporal diff.
  • mappings/<table>/readiness-status.yaml -- current_stage, per-stage status, approvals[] (named owner + date), blocking_reasons[] -- read as an already-parsed mapping; this module opens no file itself.
  • The readiness_classify refutation-first category rank (approval > grain > live_validation > artifact > readiness) -- reused to pick exactly one next action AND to route a blocked stage to its required approval surface.

Read the full file on GitHub · 208 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 208 lines · 173 tokens per session scan A daa5f7ee0c2e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

friendly-pr-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository Kemetra/Seshat-BI (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 173 tokens to every session and 2,839 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

pr-verify

Verify a Docglow change actually works before submitting or merging a PR. Runs the conformance suite, then a behavioral verification pass (flag matrix, artifact-join spot checks, pipeline contract sweep, payload budget). Use when reviewing a PR, self-reviewing a branch before opening a PR, or when asked to "verify…

docglow/docglow · 79 tokens

audit-my-assumptions

Use when a finished thing — a source, a result, code, or the record — is about to be trusted or consumed; the gate fires before the work leans on it. Fire FIRST - before a number is BUILT on inherited sources or PRESENTED from them - when the silent assumptions baked into procs, queries, exports, or workbooks have not…

debabsah/analytics-office · 249 tokens

lookml_view_reviewer

Skill "lookml_view_reviewer" from G-Schumacher44/strata-oss, covering skill: lookmlviewreviewer, trigger, inputs, allowed tools and forbidden.

G-Schumacher44/strata-oss · 0 tokens

sql-reviewer

Review SQL queries and dbt models for best practices, performance, and anti-patterns.

clawdata/clawdata · 22 tokens

test-review

You are an expert DataHub test reviewer. Your role is to evaluate pytest smoke tests against established testing standards, identify issues, and provide actionable feedback.

datahub-project/datahub · 0 tokens

ktx-analytics

Use when answering a question that needs data from a ktx-connected database - investigating, analyzing, "how many", "show me", "what's the breakdown of", finding records by value, exploring tables, comparing periods, explaining metrics, or any data-analysis request. Triggers even when the user does not say…

Kaelio/ktx · 86 tokens