Seshat-BI: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/pr-readiness-reviewer/SKILL.md

pr-readiness-reviewer is a skill for Claude Code from Kemetra/Seshat-BI. It costs 244 tokens per session (4,327 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A read-only reviewer that gives one structured verdict on whether a pull request is safe to merge. A pull request is a proposed code change for review; the verdict includes blockers, warnings, required human decisions, supporting evidence, and a next action.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess one pull request, identify what blocks merging, distinguish warnings from blockers, and see which decisions still need a human.
Why use it?
It gathers the pull request's recorded checks, test plan, approvals, readiness files, and changed files into one review result. This makes merge risks easier to find without treating the reviewer as the final authority.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions Codex.

This is Kemetra/Seshat-BI's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on Seshat-BI itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything Seshat-BI configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to Kemetra/Seshat-BI. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Kemetra/Seshat-BI/main/.claude/skills/pr-readiness-reviewer/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kemetra/Seshat-BI

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pr-readiness-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kemetra/seshat-bi/pr-readiness-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kemetra/seshat-bi/pr-readiness-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kemetra/seshat-bi/pr-readiness-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kemetra/seshat-bi/pr-readiness-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pr-readiness-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kemetra/seshat-bi/pr-readiness-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kemetra/seshat-bi/pr-readiness-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 244 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,327 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00244 $0.04327
Opus 5 $0.00122 $0.02164
Sonnet 5 $0.00049 $0.00865
Haiku 4.5 $0.00024 $0.00433

Measured 11d ago against content hash f85c23d520a5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pr-readiness-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/pr-readiness-reviewer/SKILL.md · 278 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 278 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

pr-readiness-reviewer

Module Contract -- PR Readiness Reviewer

  • Authority category: Product Module
  • Capability level: read-only (exactly one of read-only | artifact-writing | execution-capable)
  • Product layer: cross-cutting (the functional axis -- see docs/roadmap/roadmap.md; orthogonal to category; this module guards promotions at every stage and enters none)
  • Roadmap feature: F025 On-disk spec: specs/019-pr-readiness-reviewer
  • Owner: the repo maintainer / PR reviewer (a named human)
  • Status: Authored

What it does (one line)

Reads one PR's observed state and the committed readiness evidence it touches, and RENDERS a structured merge_ready verdict -- a reading of evidence, never an authority.

Core Authority it READS

It reads; it never writes these. Inputs, unchanged.

  • mappings/<table>/readiness-status.yaml -- current_stage, per-stage status, approvals[] (named owner + date), blocking_reasons[].
  • source-map.yaml -- approval / mapping-gate CLEARED metadata (when the PR touches a mapping).
  • The PR's declared test plan, the recorded seshat check / retail validate and CI results, and the PR diff / file list (for the raw-data / secret / path scan).

Derived evidence it WRITES

  • none (read-only; the verdict is rendered EPHEMERALLY to the operator -- "presents / summarizes Core Authority", NOT "writes derived evidence". No tracked verdict file is written and no committed evidence artifact is created).

Read the full file on GitHub · 278 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 278 lines · 244 tokens per session scan A f85c23d520a5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pr-readiness-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository Kemetra/Seshat-BI (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 244 tokens to every session and 4,327 once invoked, about $0.0012 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

pr-verify

Verify a Docglow change actually works before submitting or merging a PR. Runs the conformance suite, then a behavioral verification pass (flag matrix, artifact-join spot checks, pipeline contract sweep, payload budget). Use when reviewing a PR, self-reviewing a branch before opening a PR, or when asked to "verify…

docglow/docglow · 79 tokens

audit-my-assumptions

Use when a finished thing — a source, a result, code, or the record — is about to be trusted or consumed; the gate fires before the work leans on it. Fire FIRST - before a number is BUILT on inherited sources or PRESENTED from them - when the silent assumptions baked into procs, queries, exports, or workbooks have not…

debabsah/analytics-office · 249 tokens

lookml_view_reviewer

Skill "lookml_view_reviewer" from G-Schumacher44/strata-oss, covering skill: lookmlviewreviewer, trigger, inputs, allowed tools and forbidden.

G-Schumacher44/strata-oss · 0 tokens

sql-reviewer

Review SQL queries and dbt models for best practices, performance, and anti-patterns.

clawdata/clawdata · 22 tokens

test-review

You are an expert DataHub test reviewer. Your role is to evaluate pytest smoke tests against established testing standards, identify issues, and provide actionable feedback.

datahub-project/datahub · 0 tokens

ktx-analytics

Use when answering a question that needs data from a ktx-connected database - investigating, analyzing, "how many", "show me", "what's the breakdown of", finding records by value, exploring tables, comparing periods, explaining metrics, or any data-analysis request. Triggers even when the user does not say…

Kaelio/ktx · 86 tokens