Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Ken-Technology/cold-email-skills --skill qualificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ken-Technology/cold-email-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ken-technology/cold-email-skills/qualification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ken-technology/cold-email-skills/qualification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ken-technology/cold-email-skills/qualification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ken-technology/cold-email-skills/qualification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ken-technology/cold-email-skills/qualification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.01390 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00556 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00278 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00139 |
Grade A, and why
qualification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Qualification Skill
Turn a campaign plan's qualify/disqualify rules into the variables an AI qualifier runs on every prospect: an audience description, disqualification criteria, and (rarely) qualification criteria. They go in qualification.md at the root of the campaign workspace (./cold-email/{slug}/), ready for any qualification step: an AI column in Clay or a spreadsheet, or any LLM.
Inputs
- The plan's broad ICP and its qualify/disqualify rules.
- The search filters already applied (
search-strategy.mdin the campaign workspace). They tell you what NOT to restate. - The research (
research.mdand its company context) for competitors and ICP nuances, and the company knowledge folder (./knowledge/) when it exists: itscompetitors/files and who the ideal customer profile says is not a fit. - A sample of sourced leads, when available, to see real edge cases.
Use what the conversation already holds. Read only what is missing: plan.md, search-strategy.md and research.md in the campaign workspace (default ./cold-email/{slug}/ under the current directory).
What the qualifier can see
The qualifier sees ONLY:
- LinkedIn profile: title, company, location, previous roles, education, skills, summary.
- Company data: industry, headcount, HQ, description.
- Website metadata: page title and meta description only.
It does NOT see full site content, tech stack, news, funding, social posts, press, events, or any time-sensitive signal. Every criterion must be checkable against the data above. Rewrite or drop any rule that depends on something else.
Core Principles
- Write short, trust the AI - Give it a short, plain-language brief and let it reason. A few high-signal lines beat an exhaustive rulebook. No long lists of titles, industries, or product names.
- Never repeat the search filters - The filters already bound the list (headcount, geography, titles, seniority, industries). Do not restate any of it, not in the audience description and not as a criterion. Qualification only catches what the filters can't see.
- Don't over-qualify - Qualification is a safety net, not a precision filter. When data is incomplete or ambiguous, qualify.
- Disqualification over qualification - Prefer audience description + a few disqualifiers. Add qualification criteria only for a real positive signal worth confirming.
- Always exclude competitors - The one disqualifier that is always worth including.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago Changed · +6 lines · +5 tokens per session 01074b6f560a
- 2mo ago First seen · 93 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 530e82742639
qualification is a skill published in the GitHub repository Ken-Technology/cold-email-skills (4 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 1,390 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
qualification compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qualificationKen-Technology/cold-email-skills | Skill | 4 | 6d ago | MIT | A | 60 | Claude Code, Codex |
| cold-emailFrontal-so/outbound-skills | Skill | 9 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 177 | Claude Code, Codex |
| list-buildingFrontal-so/outbound-skills | Skill | 9 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 190 | Claude Code, Codex |
| claygentFrontal-so/outbound-skills | Skill | 9 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 131 | Claude Code |
| conditional-logicFrontal-so/outbound-skills | Skill | 9 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 128 | Claude Code |
| people-enrichmentFrontal-so/outbound-skills | Skill | 9 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 110 | Claude Code |
| scoringFrontal-so/outbound-skills | Skill | 9 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 113 | Claude Code |