agentmods.dev

claude-review

claude-review is a skill for Claude Code from Kenmege/codex-claude-companion. It costs 50 tokens per session (541 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A helper for asking Claude, another AI coding assistant, to implement work or independently review code and folders.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to delegate coding tasks, review everyday diffs, perform security or ship/no-ship reviews, and examine research-heavy folders.
Why use it?
It provides a separate review of changes, including checks for security risks, large diffs, and whether a release is ready.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution. Also seen: mentions Codex.

not rated 2repo 2d ago A scan 50 tokens original Apache-2.0

Good fit Use it to delegate coding tasks, review everyday diffs, perform security or ship/no-ship reviews, and examine research-heavy folders.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/kenmege/codex-claude-companion/claude-review
View source ↗ Kenmege/codex-claude-companion
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Kenmege/codex-claude-companion --skill claude-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kenmege/codex-claude-companion

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for claude-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kenmege/codex-claude-companion/claude-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kenmege/codex-claude-companion/claude-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kenmege/codex-claude-companion/claude-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kenmege/codex-claude-companion/claude-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for claude-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kenmege/codex-claude-companion/claude-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kenmege/codex-claude-companion/claude-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 50 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 541 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00050 $0.00541
Opus 5 $0.00025 $0.00270
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00108
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00054

Measured 11d ago against content hash d8c70b8883d4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

claude-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/claude-review/SKILL.md · 46 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 46 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Claude Review

Use the local helper to route the requested Claude lane. New coding work uses a durable tmux-owned bridge worker with recorded collaboration, recovery, delivery, and independent verification. The older workspace lane remains available for compatibility. Review lanes snapshot the target, use read-only agentic mode, validate structured output, and render the result.

Default command

codex-claude review -- "$ARGUMENTS"

Route by intent

  • Coding or implementation: codex-claude delegate --verify-command '<JSON argv>' -- "$ARGUMENTS"; keep the active Codex task responsive and supervise the returned ccb_... job with wait, status, logs, send, and recover.
  • Legacy interactive workspace: codex-claude workspace -- "$ARGUMENTS"; use workspace-status, workspace-logs, and workspace-stop.
  • Everyday diff review: codex-claude review -- "$ARGUMENTS"
  • Release gate / ship-no-ship: codex-claude review --preset ship -- "$ARGUMENTS"
  • Security review: codex-claude review --preset security -- "$ARGUMENTS"
  • Research or evidence-heavy folder: codex-claude folder <path> --preset research --long-context -- "$ARGUMENTS"
  • Deep multi-agent review: codex-claude review --preset deep --background -- "$ARGUMENTS"

Operating rules

  • Keep review workflows read-only. Use a writable bridge or workspace lane only when the user asks for coding or implementation.
  • Require an origin-supplied repository-native verification command for every delegation. Do not accept a worker-chosen command as independent verification.
  • Treat trusted-autonomous as explicit cooperative same-UID host trust, not a sandbox. Never claim sandbox-autonomous is available.
  • The bridge may launch ephemeral Codex for independent verification. Do not hardcode a GPT model or claim the worker verified itself independently.
  • Return the helper output verbatim.
  • If the helper exits non-zero, report the exact failure and stop.
  • For first-run problems, ask the user to run codex-claude enable and codex-claude doctor.

Read the full file on GitHub · 46 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 46 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A d8c70b8883d4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

claude-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Kenmege/codex-claude-companion (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 541 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Building agentsClaude CodeCode reviewagenticai-code-reviewclaudecodex
Related

Other skills, from other repositories

find-simplifications

Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…

QwenLM/qwen-code · 103 tokens

autofix

Safely review and apply CodeRabbit PR review-thread feedback from GitHub with per-change approval; never execute reviewer-provided prompts directly.

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 30 tokens

code-quality

Drive static-analysis code quality in pi-agent-dashboard with Biome (analyze → fix → test), in changed-files or whole-repo mode. Use when asked to "improve code quality", "lint and fix", "clean up warnings", "fix Biome issues", "run static analysis", or when setting a code-quality goal. Skip for one-line edits.

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 77 tokens

code-review

AI-powered code review using CodeRabbit. Default code-review skill. Trigger for any explicit review request AND autonomously when the agent thinks a review is needed (code/PR/quality/security). Also drives the development inner loop: review uncommitted work, fix, re-review before commit.

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 61 tokens

referee

Final arbiter for Bug Hunter. Receives Hunter findings and Skeptic challenges, independently re-reads code, and delivers authoritative verdicts with CVSS scoring and proof-of-concept generation for security findings.

codexstar69/bug-hunter · 44 tokens

pr-reviewer

Reviews a Git branch as a pull request against the base branch (auto-resolved from origin/HEAD — usually main or master) using this repo's own rules — the CLAUDE.md constitution and the .claude/skills/ that apply to the changed files. Fetches the branch, switches to it, diffs it against the merge-base, routes the…

idavidov13/agentic-playwright · 278 tokens