AgentsView is a local application that collects coding-agent sessions into a searchable database and web interface, including usage and cost statistics. Developers use it to browse, analyze, and track sessions from Claude Code, Codex, and other supported agents, while the catalogue add-ons help operate it.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/kenn-io/agentsview/testing-without-tautologiesnpx skills add kenn-io/agentsview --skill testing-without-tautologiesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kenn-io/agentsviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kenn-io/agentsview/testing-without-tautologies)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kenn-io/agentsview/testing-without-tautologies"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kenn-io/agentsview/testing-without-tautologies.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00054 | $0.01896 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00948 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00379 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00190 |
Grade A, and why
testing-without-tautologies scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 187 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing Without Tautologies
Core Idea
Tests should fail when protected behavior breaks. A passing test helps only if it can catch a real problem.
Before writing or changing a test, ask: "What production change should make this test fail?" If you cannot answer, redesign the test.
Quality Gate
Before writing the test body, answer these:
- Who uses this? Prefer public APIs, HTTP responses, SSE events, persisted rows, parsed session output, rendered UI, or CLI output. Avoid private state.
- What example proves it? Use concrete inputs and literal expected outputs. For parsers, hand-write the fixture JSONL and the expected sessions/messages; do not run the parser to generate expectations.
- What break would this catch? Name the wrong branch, missing side effect, wrong argument, boundary case, or contract violation.
- Do we own it? Test our choices at framework, database, and filesystem boundaries. Do not re-test documented dependency mechanics.
- Can you state it? Given this setup, when the user/system does X, then Y observable behavior changes. If Y is not assertable, the test is not ready.
Required Checks
Apply these checks to every new or modified test:
-
Assert observable effects
- Check returned values, rows in the DB, HTTP status and body, emitted SSE events, parsed message content, rendered DOM, or errors.
- A no-assertion test is acceptable only when the failure mode is the subject, such as "this config rejects invalid input." Prefer explicit assertions anyway.
- Use
require.Xfor checks that must abort the test (setup errors, nil receivers, length before indexing) andassert.Xfor independent checks. Neverif got != want { t.Fatalf(...) }in new tests.
-
Make fakes and mocks specific
- Verify arguments, call counts, order, and branches when they are part of the contract.
- Do not let a fake accept any input when the code must pass one value.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 187 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 27a8ccff18f9
testing-without-tautologies is a skill published in the GitHub repository kenn-io/agentsview (5,755 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 1,896 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
testing
Testing workflow and quality standards for writing and running tests. Use when: (1) Writing new tests, (2) Adding a new feature that needs tests, (3) Modifying logic that has existing tests, (4) Before claiming a task is complete.
testing-patterns
Testing patterns and principles. Unit, integration, mocking strategies.
testing
Writing or debugging tests, choosing unit vs integration style, Postgres/ClickHouse tests, regenerating ClickHouse test schema, or exporting test helpers from packages without pulling test code into production bundles.
detect-flaky-tests
Detects flaky Go tests by analyzing GitHub Actions workflow runs across the last 7 days and all PRs — covering both the run-tests job (unit/integration) and the e2e-test job (gVisor and microVM lanes). For each newly-detected flaky test or infra issue, opens a GitHub issue with full evidence and a draft fix PR. Does…
test-pyramid
Analyze the repo's unit and E2E tests and propose rebalancing toward a test pyramid — which E2E tests (or assertions inside them) can be covered by unit tests, which unit-level gaps genuinely need E2E coverage, and where coverage is duplicated. Use when the user asks about test pyramid, test rebalancing, "should this…
designing-tests
Designs and implements testing strategies for any codebase. Use when adding tests, improving coverage, setting up testing infrastructure, debugging test failures, or when asked about unit tests, integration tests, or E2E testing.