Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kennethkhoocy/legal-scholarship-skills --skill writing-article-plansgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kennethkhoocy/legal-scholarship-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kennethkhoocy/legal-scholarship-skills/writing-article-plans)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kennethkhoocy/legal-scholarship-skills/writing-article-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kennethkhoocy/legal-scholarship-skills/writing-article-plans/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kennethkhoocy/legal-scholarship-skills/writing-article-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kennethkhoocy/legal-scholarship-skills/writing-article-plans.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 192 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Rogue Agent · line 3 Skill establishes unauthorized persistence across sessions via cron jobs, startup scripts, or state files. Session persistence allows an attacker to maintain access beyond the current interaction.Fix: Remove any persistence mechanisms (cron jobs, startup scripts, state files). Skills should not maintain state across sessions without explicit user consent.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00313 | $0.08306 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00125 | $0.03322 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00063 | $0.01661 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00831 |
Grade A, and why
writing-article-plans scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 636 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Writing Article Plans
Overview
Write a comprehensive article plan assuming the drafter has zero context for the
project and will write the manuscript one section at a time. The plan carries the
whole argument down to the level of individual argument moves, so the drafter
produces prose that realizes a decided argument rather than inventing one. This
is the planning half of an academic-writing pipeline that mirrors the superpowers
writing-plans → subagent-driven-development pattern.
Structure is first order here: the plan inherits its architecture — section
skeleton, proportions, intro moves, footnote policy — from a per-genre
structural profile extracted from a candidate manuscript (see "Genre Structural
Profiles"). Prose style is entirely downstream: the drafter writes plain,
correct prose and style-emulation restyles it later. A structural mistake,
unlike a stylistic one, cannot be fixed downstream. In standalone mode there is
no later restyle, so the drafter's plain, correct prose is the final prose: it
still avoids authorial-voice mimicry, but its clarity and polish must reach
delivery quality rather than a draft awaiting a restyle.
Position in the pipeline:
spec ──▶ [writing-article-plans] ──▶ plan.md
│
▼
section-drafter subagents ──▶ draft .tex (with % CITE slots)
│
▼
lit-review-orchestrator (find the literature; keyed pipeline, defaults)
│
▼
cite-placement (fill every % CITE slot; mode per the profile's citation architecture)
│
▼
style-emulation (restyle to author voice — the refinement)
The plan is always Markdown. The manuscript the drafter writes is LaTeX
(main.tex + \input{sections/<name>.tex}), so it drops straight into the
existing estout / latex-results pipeline.
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- .claude/scheduled_tasks.lock 124 B
- prompts/codex-plan-redteam.md 5.2 KB
- prompts/codex-section-conformance.md 4.4 KB
- prompts/plan-reviewer.md 2.5 KB
- prompts/section-drafter.md 6.0 KB
- README.md 11 KB
- references/genre-structures/empirical/expanding-shareholder-voice.md 7.6 KB
- references/genre-structures/law_review/shareholder-democracy.md 7.6 KB
- references/genre-structures/theory/liability-nondisclosure-ipos.md 7.1 KB
- references/plan-template.md 15 KB
- references/prompt-and-choices-example.md 7.3 KB
- scripts/assemble_manuscript.py 3.2 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 636 lines · 313 tokens per session scan A f48381eb3c3d
writing-article-plans is a skill published in the GitHub repository kennethkhoocy/legal-scholarship-skills (7 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 313 tokens to every session and 8,306 once invoked, about $0.0013 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
baoyu-youtube-transcript
A tool for downloading the written captions, subtitles, chapter information, speaker labels, and cover image from a YouTube video using its URL or ID.
baoyu-comic
A tool for creating original educational comics that explain knowledge or ideas through multiple illustrated panels. It supports different art styles and tones and can create several comics in one batch.
baoyu-diagram
Create professional, dark-themed SVG diagrams of any type — architecture diagrams, flowcharts, sequence diagrams, structural diagrams, mind maps, timelines, illustrative/conceptual diagrams, and more. Use this skill whenever the user asks for any kind of technical or conceptual diagram, visualization of a system…
playwright-cli
Automates browser interactions for testing and validating your own web applications using playwright-cli. Use when you need terminal-first browser control for navigation, form filling, screenshots, tracing, bound browser sessions, debugging, or generating Playwright test code. Only use against applications you own or…
spring-boot-team-harness
Use when a team wants every developer's coding agent (Claude Code or Codex) to follow the same rules on a Maven Spring Boot 4 repository: setting up AGENTS.md, guardrails, shared agent settings, or build and CI checks that agents must pass before code merges. It adds ./mvnw verify gates that fail on null-safety bugs…
agent-wiki
Incremental LLM-friendly wiki generator for Obsidian note vaults. Use when: (1) Building wiki from notes, (2) Ingesting notes to wiki, (3) Obsidian LLM wiki, (4) Incremental knowledge base management. Triggers: 'build wiki from notes', 'ingest notes to wiki', 'Obsidian LLM wiki', 'incremental knowledge base'.