audit-code-review

audit-code-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from kensaurus/cursor-kenji. It costs 63 tokens per session (2,078 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review guide for examining a pull request or a named set of code changes for quality, security, and maintainability.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review pull requests and diffs, explain specific findings, and label issues by urgency. It also checks the relevant project documentation before reviewing.
Why use it?
It helps catch bugs, security problems, data leaks, and changes that may break existing behavior before the work is merged.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/kensaurus/cursor-kenji/audit-code-review
Any agent
npx skills add kensaurus/cursor-kenji --skill audit-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kensaurus/cursor-kenji

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for audit-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kensaurus/cursor-kenji/audit-code-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kensaurus/cursor-kenji/audit-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kensaurus/cursor-kenji/audit-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kensaurus/cursor-kenji/audit-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 63 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,078 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00063 $0.02078
Opus 5 $0.00032 $0.01039
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.00416
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00208

Measured yesterday against content hash fc603a8b4498, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

audit-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/audit-code-review/SKILL.md · 296 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 296 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Review Skill

Degree of freedom: MIXED — Phases 1–2 judgment [HIGH freedom]; mandatory pre-review git/docs [LOW freedom — run exactly].

Review this PR or named diff. Repo-wide anti-patterns → audit-code-quality. Bulk transform semantics → audit-codemod-safety.

How to reason

  1. Observe — quote the hunk and the surrounding file (not the line alone)
  2. Interpret — what breaks, leaks, or duplicates if this merges?
  3. Classify — blocking / suggestion / nit / praise
  4. Severity — security, data-loss, or break-existing = blocking

Worked example

Observe: new GET /api/invoices/:id returns Invoice.findById(id) with no userId predicate (app/api/invoices/[id]/route.ts in this diff). Interpret: any authenticated caller reads another user's invoice. Classify: blocking (IDOR). Severity: Critical — must fix before merge. Finding: [id]/route.ts | add ownership check | blocking

MANDATORY: Pre-Review Checks [LOW freedom — run exactly]

BEFORE reviewing code, you MUST:

1. Read Relevant Documentation

README.md (project conventions)
src/[domain]/@_[domain]-README.md (domain-specific patterns)
CONTRIBUTING.md (code standards)

2. Understand the Full Change

If reviewing a PR or commit:

git log --oneline -10 # recent context
git diff <base>..HEAD --stat # files changed
git diff <base>..HEAD # full diff

If reviewing a specific file, read the FULL file for context — not just the changed lines.

3. Check for Duplicate Implementations

Use Grep and SemanticSearch to verify:

  • Does this code duplicate existing functionality?
  • Is there an existing component/service that should have been extended?
  • Does this follow established patterns in the codebase?

4. Check Production Impact (Sentry)

If the change touches error-prone code, check if related Sentry issues exist:

sentry:search_issues
{
 "organizationSlug": "<ORG_SLUG>",
 "query": "issues related to <component or function being changed>",
 "projectSlugOrId": "<PROJECT_SLUG>",
 "regionUrl": "<REGION_URL>",
 "limit": 10
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 296 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 296 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A fc603a8b4498

Subscribe to this mod's changes

audit-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository kensaurus/cursor-kenji (9 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 2,078 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

comprehensive-enrichment

Enrich any person or company from any identifier — email, name, LinkedIn URL, domain, company name, Twitter/X handle. Use when asked to enrich, look up, or research a lead, contact, person, or company.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills · 53 tokens

paid-channel-prioritizer

For founders who don't know where to start with paid ads. Analyzes ICP, competitor ad presence, budget constraints, and product type to recommend which 1-2 paid channels to start with and provides a 90-day ramp plan. Prevents the common mistake of spreading a small budget across too many platforms.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills · 70 tokens

data-charts-tako

Search and visualize the world's data - get charts, insights, and embeddable knowledge cards for finance, economics, demographics, sports, and more.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills · 35 tokens

lead-discovery

Orchestrator that runs first for lead generation requests. Gathers business context via website analysis or questions, identifies competitors, builds ICP, and routes to signal skills with pre-filled inputs.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills · 41 tokens

render-cosmic-mythology-voiceover

Assemble a cosmic-mythology-voiceover reel from a config — a warm spoken voiceover carries the whole narrative while N curated cosmic stills are weighted beat-synced across the delivered VO duration (cutdur = VOdur times weight over the weight sum, so emotional beats hold longer), Ken-Burns-zoomed per still (scale 2x…

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills · 223 tokens

review-scraper

Scrape product reviews from G2, Capterra, and Trustpilot using Apify. Single script with platform dispatch. Use when you need to monitor competitor reviews, track product sentiment, or gather customer feedback from review sites.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills · 51 tokens