Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kevinnft/ai-agent-skills --skill trl-fine-tuninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kevinnft/ai-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kevinnft/ai-agent-skills/trl-fine-tuning)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kevinnft/ai-agent-skills/trl-fine-tuning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kevinnft/ai-agent-skills/trl-fine-tuning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kevinnft/ai-agent-skills/trl-fine-tuning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kevinnft/ai-agent-skills/trl-fine-tuning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.03231 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.01292 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00646 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00323 |
Grade A, and why
trl-fine-tuning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to trl-fine-tuning — 86 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 467 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TRL - Transformer Reinforcement Learning
Quick start
TRL provides post-training methods for aligning language models with human preferences.
Installation:
pip install trl transformers datasets peft accelerate
Supervised Fine-Tuning (instruction tuning):
from trl import SFTTrainer
trainer = SFTTrainer(
model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B",
train_dataset=dataset, # Prompt-completion pairs
)
trainer.train()
DPO (align with preferences):
from trl import DPOTrainer, DPOConfig
config = DPOConfig(output_dir="model-dpo", beta=0.1)
trainer = DPOTrainer(
model=model,
args=config,
train_dataset=preference_dataset, # chosen/rejected pairs
processing_class=tokenizer
)
trainer.train()
Common workflows
Workflow 1: Full RLHF pipeline (SFT → Reward Model → PPO)
Complete pipeline from base model to human-aligned model.
Copy this checklist:
RLHF Training:
- [ ] Step 1: Supervised fine-tuning (SFT)
- [ ] Step 2: Train reward model
- [ ] Step 3: PPO reinforcement learning
- [ ] Step 4: Evaluate aligned model
Step 1: Supervised fine-tuning
Train base model on instruction-following data:
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from trl import SFTTrainer, SFTConfig
from datasets import load_dataset
# Load model
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B")
# Load instruction dataset
dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/Capybara", split="train")
# Configure training
training_args = SFTConfig(
output_dir="Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT",
per_device_train_batch_size=4,
num_train_epochs=1,
learning_rate=2e-5,
logging_steps=10,
save_strategy="epoch"
)
# Train
trainer = SFTTrainer(
model=model,
args=training_args,
train_dataset=dataset,
tokenizer=tokenizer
)
trainer.train()
trainer.save_model()
Step 2: Train reward model
Train model to predict human preferences:
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 467 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 44d62cf56a16
trl-fine-tuning is a skill published in the GitHub repository kevinnft/ai-agent-skills (14 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 3,231 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to trl-fine-tuning, differing in 86 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-privacy-assessment
Guides the combined DPIA and AI Act conformity assessment for AI systems processing personal data. Covers EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 5/2021, training data lawfulness under Art. 6 and Art. 9, Art. 22 automated decision-making, algorithmic bias detection, and NIST AI RMF MAP function. Keywords: AI privacy, DPIA, AI Act…
ai-inventory-bossmann007
Inventário de sistemas de IA por sistema (framework brasileiro) — rastreia o papel de cada sistema (fornecedor/desenvolvedor, operador/implementador, distribuidor) e o nível de risco (risco excessivo/proibido, alto risco, risco geral) sob o PL 2338/2023 e a sobreposição da LGPD (Art. 20 — decisão automatizada). Papel…
arckit-au-ai-assurance-tractorjuice
You are an enterprise architect generating an AI assurance assessment for an Australian Government or regulated-sector AI / machine-learning system.
leiloeiro-edital-ranbot-ai
Analise e auditoria de editais de leilao judicial e extrajudicial. Riscos ocultos, clausulas perigosas, debitos, ocupante e classificacao da oportunidade.
triage-government-ai-use-case-l0cka
Route an Australian government AI use case to the applicable assurance track — the mandatory DTA policy artefacts for Commonwealth entities or the state and territory frameworks for NSW, Victoria, Queensland, WA, SA, Tasmania, the ACT and the NT — with each jurisdiction's escalation threshold, using a verified…
assess-automated-decision-transparency-l0cka
Assess current and commencing Australian privacy transparency obligations for automated and AI-assisted decisions, including Privacy Act APP 1.7–1.9 commencing 10 December 2026 and Western Australia PRIS IPP 10 from 1 July 2026. Use for decision inventories, privacy-policy readiness, consequential AI decisions…