Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/kevintsengtw/dotnet-testing-agent-skills/dotnet-testing-complex-object-comparisonnpx skills add kevintsengtw/dotnet-testing-agent-skills --skill dotnet-testing-complex-object-comparisongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kevintsengtw/dotnet-testing-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kevintsengtw/dotnet-testing-agent-skills/dotnet-testing-complex-object-comparison)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kevintsengtw/dotnet-testing-agent-skills/dotnet-testing-complex-object-comparison"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kevintsengtw/dotnet-testing-agent-skills/dotnet-testing-complex-object-comparison.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00199 | $0.02737 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00100 | $0.01368 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00040 | $0.00547 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00274 |
Grade A, and why
dotnet-testing-complex-object-comparison scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 288 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
複雜物件比對指南（Complex Object Comparison）
核心使用場景
1. 深層物件結構比對 (Object Graph Comparison)
當需要比對包含多層巢狀屬性的複雜物件時：
[Fact]
public void ComplexObject_深層結構比對_應完全相符()
{
var expected = new Order
{
Id = 1,
Customer = new Customer
{
Name = "John Doe",
Address = new Address
{
Street = "123 Main St",
City = "Seattle",
ZipCode = "98101"
}
},
Items = new[]
{
new OrderItem { ProductName = "Laptop", Quantity = 1, Price = 999.99m },
new OrderItem { ProductName = "Mouse", Quantity = 2, Price = 29.99m }
}
};
var actual = orderService.GetOrder(1);
// 深層物件比對
actual.Should().BeEquivalentTo(expected);
}
2. 循環參照處理 (Circular Reference Handling)
處理物件之間存在循環參照的情況：
[Fact]
public void TreeStructure_循環參照_應正確處理()
{
// 建立具有父子雙向參照的樹狀結構
var parent = new TreeNode { Value = "Root" };
var child1 = new TreeNode { Value = "Child1", Parent = parent };
var child2 = new TreeNode { Value = "Child2", Parent = parent };
parent.Children = new[] { child1, child2 };
var actualTree = treeService.GetTree("Root");
// 處理循環參照
actualTree.Should().BeEquivalentTo(parent, options =>
options.IgnoringCyclicReferences()
.WithMaxRecursionDepth(10)
);
}
3-6. 進階比對模式
AwesomeAssertions 還提供多種進階比對模式：動態欄位排除（排除時間戳記、自動生成欄位）、巢狀物件欄位排除、大量資料效能最佳化比對（選擇性屬性比對、抽樣驗證策略）、以及嚴格/寬鬆排序控制。
完整程式碼範例請參閱 references/detailed-comparison-patterns.md
比對選項速查表
| 選項方法 | 用途 | 適用場景 |
|---|---|---|
Excluding(x => x.Property) |
排除特定屬性 | 排除時間戳記、自動生成欄位 |
Including(x => x.Property) |
只包含特定屬性 | 關鍵屬性驗證 |
IgnoringCyclicReferences() |
忽略循環參照 | 樹狀結構、雙向關聯 |
WithMaxRecursionDepth(n) |
限制遞迴深度 | 深層巢狀結構 |
WithStrictOrdering() |
嚴格順序比對 | 陣列/集合順序重要時 |
WithoutStrictOrdering() |
寬鬆順序比對 | 陣列/集合順序不重要時 |
WithTracing() |
啟用追蹤 | 除錯複雜比對失敗 |
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 288 lines · 199 tokens per session scan A 24ea976e00bd
dotnet-testing-complex-object-comparison is a skill published in the GitHub repository kevintsengtw/dotnet-testing-agent-skills (28 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 199 tokens to every session and 2,737 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
author-test
Generate a test given sample. Parameters: C# SDK repository root; Package name: one of Azure.AI.Projects, Azure.AI.Projects.Agents or Azure.AI.Extensions.OpenAI; the sample to use as a starting point for the test.
migrate-xunit-to-xunit-v3
Migrate .NET test projects from xUnit.net v2 to xunit.v3 and fix v3 breaks. Use for package/CPM conversion, OutputType=Exe, preserving the VSTest or MTP runner (including projects currently using YTest.MTP.XUnit2), incompatible TFMs, async void tests, string-to-Type attributes, custom Fact/Theory/BeforeAfterTest…
clean-architecture-dotnet
Use when domain logic leaks into API/Infrastructure, project references violate layer boundaries, or you need to decide between CQS (always), CQRS bus (complex domains), and DDD patterns (invariants and events).
creating-dotnet-mcp-servers
Use when building Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers in .NET, configuring tools, transports (SSE/stdio), JSON serialization for AOT, or testing MCP endpoints.
csharp-xunit
Your goal is to help me write effective unit tests with XUnit, covering both standard and data-driven testing approaches.
cratis-specs-csharp
Step-by-step guidance for writing C# specs in Cratis with BDD Specification by Example — the Establish/Because/should pattern, for/when/and folder hierarchy, reusable given/ contexts, NSubstitute mocking, and the in-process scenario family. Use when writing C# unit or integration specs or structuring the for/when/and…