Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add KhaledSaeed18/dotclaude --skill accessibility-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KhaledSaeed18/dotclaudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/khaledsaeed18/dotclaude/accessibility-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/khaledsaeed18/dotclaude/accessibility-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/khaledsaeed18/dotclaude/accessibility-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/khaledsaeed18/dotclaude/accessibility-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/khaledsaeed18/dotclaude/accessibility-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.01036 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00414 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00207 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
accessibility-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Audit for the users who hit the wall, not for the checklist: someone on a keyboard who cannot reach the button, a screen-reader user who hears "button button", a low-vision user who cannot read grey-on-white hints. Automated checks catch at most a third of real barriers; the rest come from reading the code and walking the flows. Prefer fixing semantics over adding ARIA; the first rule of ARIA is not to use it when native HTML already does the job.
Step 1: Scope and method
Identify what is being audited (components in a diff, a page, a whole flow) and pick the method:
- Running app available: audit in the browser. Use the
webapp-testingskill's Playwright setup and inject axe-core for the automated pass, then do the manual keyboard walk below. - Code only: review the markup and interaction logic directly. State that contrast and reading-order findings are provisional until seen rendered.
For the automated pass with Playwright:
await page.goto(url);
await page.addScriptTag({ url: "https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/axe-core@4/axe.min.js" });
const results = await page.evaluate(() => axe.run());
// results.violations: id, impact, nodes[].html, nodes[].target
Treat axe output as a floor, not the audit.
Step 2: The manual pass
Work through these in order of user impact:
Keyboard
- Every interactive element reachable with Tab, operable with Enter/Space, in an order that follows the visual flow. No focus traps except intentional ones (modals) that also release on Escape.
- Focus visible at every stop (WCAG 2.2 requires it not be fully obscured). No
outline: nonewithout a replacement. - After actions that move context (opening a modal, deleting a list item, route change in a SPA): focus is placed deliberately, not dropped to
<body>.
Semantics and names
- Native elements for native jobs:
<button>not<div onClick>,<a href>for navigation,<label for>on every form control. A clickable div needs role, tabindex, and key handlers to equal a button; flag it and recommend the element instead. - Every control has an accessible name that matches its visible label; icon-only buttons have
aria-label. Images: informative ones have realalt, decorative ones havealt="". - Headings form an outline (one
h1, no skipped levels used for styling). Landmarks (main,nav) present once each.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -9 tokens per session 42e6f268926d
- 1mo ago First seen · 56 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A 82301d093627
accessibility-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository KhaledSaeed18/dotclaude (5 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 1,036 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
information-architecture
Design the structure of a website or product including sitemap, navigation, URL structure, content types, taxonomy, and labeling. Use this skill whenever the user asks to plan a sitemap, design navigation, structure URLs, define content types, build taxonomies, design site search, or organize content at the system…
journey-mapping
Build customer journey maps and service blueprints that visualize the end-to-end user experience including touchpoints, emotions, friction, and underlying systems. Use this skill whenever the user wants to map a customer journey, build a service blueprint, identify friction across an experience, align teams on the…
usability-testing
Plan and run usability tests on existing or prototype designs including test design, task scripts, moderation, observation, and findings synthesis. Use this skill whenever the user wants to test usability, run a moderated test, run an unmoderated test, validate a design, find usability issues, or improve task…
brand-style-guide
Build or audit a comprehensive brand style guide that documents the full brand system including story, logo system, color, typography, imagery, voice, applications, and dos/don'ts. Use this skill whenever the user wants to create brand guidelines, document an existing brand, build a brand book, audit an existing style…
visual-qa
Runs rigorous visual QA across web, terminal, and paginated surfaces: an Apple HIG-based checklist, paired light/dark captures at phone and desktop widths, screenshot evidence, and a per-item PASS/FAIL verdict. Use for any UI build or change, or when asked whether a page, component, or TUI looks right or follows the…
frontend
Builds, styles, and polishes anything drawn with HTML, CSS, or SVG: web UI, pages, components, HTML reports rendered to PDF or print, figures, PNG/SVG diagrams, slides, and images for Notion or Slack. Use for any styling, layout, animation, or visual-quality task, or when asked to make something look or feel a certain…