Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to khanh-vu/claude-force. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/khanh-vu/claude-force/main/.claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/khanh-vu/claude-forceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/khanh-vu/claude-force/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/khanh-vu/claude-force/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/khanh-vu/claude-force/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/khanh-vu/claude-force/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/khanh-vu/claude-force/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.03443 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.01377 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00689 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00344 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
const response = await fetch(url); How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 596 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Review Skill
Overview
Comprehensive code review checklists, patterns, and best practices for conducting thorough, constructive code reviews across multiple languages and frameworks.
Capabilities
- Security vulnerability detection
- Performance issue identification
- Code quality assessment
- Best practices enforcement
- Architecture review
- Test coverage analysis
Code Review Checklist
1. Functionality ✅
Core Requirements:
- Code implements the specified requirements
- Edge cases are handled
- Error handling is comprehensive
- Business logic is correct
- No hardcoded values (use configuration)
Testing:
- Unit tests are present and comprehensive
- Integration tests cover critical paths
- Test names are descriptive
- Mocks are appropriate
- Coverage meets project standards (typically 80%+)
2. Security 🔒
OWASP Top 10:
- No SQL injection vulnerabilities
- No XSS (Cross-Site Scripting) vulnerabilities
- No CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery) vulnerabilities
- No insecure deserialization
- Authentication is properly implemented
- Authorization checks are in place
- Sensitive data is not logged
- Secrets are not hardcoded
Input Validation:
// ❌ Bad: No validation
function updateUser(data) {
return db.users.update(data);
}
// ✅ Good: Validate input
function updateUser(data: UpdateUserDTO) {
validateEmail(data.email);
validateAge(data.age);
sanitizeInput(data.bio);
return db.users.update(data);
}
SQL Injection Prevention:
# ❌ Bad: String concatenation
query = f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}"
# ✅ Good: Parameterized query
query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s"
cursor.execute(query, (user_id,))
Authentication:
// ✅ Check authentication on protected routes
if (!req.user || !req.user.isAuthenticated) {
return res.status(401).json({ error: 'Unauthorized' });
}
// ✅ Check authorization
if (req.user.id !== resource.ownerId) {
return res.status(403).json({ error: 'Forbidden' });
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 596 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c6e83bf99e15
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository khanh-vu/claude-force (6 stars, last pushed 11mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3,443 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…